Department of Endodontics, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Int Endod J. 2013 May;46(5):399-405. doi: 10.1111/iej.12000. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
To assess the effects of six electronic apex locators (EALs) on pacemaker function in vitro.
Six EALs (Mini Apex Locator®, Dentaport ZX®, Novapex®, Raypex5®, Root ZX mini®, and Justy II®) were tested for electromagnetic interference (EMI) with one pacemaker (Saint Jude Medical). The pacemaker, with a single electrode, was immersed in a saline solution bath adjusted to 400-800 hms to simulate the electrical resistance of the human body and to register the activity by the system. The pacemaker was tested with each of the EALs to analyse the presence of EMI with the EAL switched on, the EAL switched off and during EAL operation. Each series of tests began with a 15-second baseline recording (R0) and continued until all the recording conditions had been covered. The conditions were as follows: R1: recording with the lead of the EAL <2 cm from the tip of the electrode; R2: recording with the lead of the EAL <2 cm from the generator; R3: recording with the lead of the EAL <2 cm from the sensing arc; and R4: recording with the lead of the EAL 15 cm from the sensing arc. If any of the EALs produced interference, its characteristics were categorized.
When the lead of the EAL was <2 cm from the tip of the electrode, the majority of the EALs tested produced only background noise. Only one (the Mini Apex Locator) resulted in EMI that was detected as false heart activity. When the EAL was <2 cm from the generator, just one EAL detected background noise (the Mini Apex Locator). When the EAL was <2 cm from the sensing arc or 15 cm from the sensing arc, the recordings were not affected by any of the EALs. There were no significant differences amongst the EALs analysed with respect to the production of EMI.
EMI occurred when the EALs were placed close to the tip of the electrode and occasionally when close to the pacemaker; however, no EMI was detected when the EALs were placed near to or 15 cm from the sensing arc in this laboratory experimental model.
评估六种电子根尖定位仪(EAL)对体外起搏器功能的影响。
用一种起搏器(圣犹达医疗公司)对六种 EAL(Mini Apex Locator®、Dentaport ZX®、Novapex®、Raypex5®、Root ZX mini®和 Justy II®)进行电磁干扰(EMI)测试。将具有单个电极的起搏器浸入盐水浴中,调整电阻至 400-800 hms,以模拟人体的电阻,并通过系统记录起搏器的活动。用每种 EAL 对起搏器进行测试,分析 EAL 开启、关闭和操作时是否存在 EMI。每一系列测试均从 15 秒基线记录(R0)开始,并持续到所有记录条件都被覆盖。记录条件如下:R1:用 EAL 的导联距电极尖端<2cm 进行记录;R2:用 EAL 的导联距发生器<2cm 进行记录;R3:用 EAL 的导联距感测弧<2cm 进行记录;R4:用 EAL 的导联距感测弧 15cm 进行记录。如果任何 EAL 产生干扰,则对其特征进行分类。
当 EAL 的导联距电极尖端<2cm 时,大多数测试的 EAL 仅产生背景噪声。只有一个(Mini Apex Locator)产生了被检测为虚假心脏活动的 EMI。当 EAL 距发生器<2cm 时,只有一个 EAL 检测到背景噪声(Mini Apex Locator)。当 EAL 距感测弧<2cm 或 15cm 时,记录未受任何 EAL 的影响。在 EMI 的产生方面,没有分析的 EAL 之间存在显著差异。
当 EAL 靠近电极尖端或偶尔靠近起搏器时,会发生 EMI;然而,在本实验室实验模型中,当 EAL 靠近或距感测弧 15cm 时,未检测到 EMI。