• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根管 ZX 和 iPex 根尖定位仪的评估:一项体内研究。

An evaluation of root ZX and iPex apex locators: an in vivo study.

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Endod. 2011 May;37(5):608-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.002
PMID:21496657
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

iPex is a fourth-generation apex locator (EAL) that has not yet been tested in vivo. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the Root ZX (J Morita Corp, Tokyo, Japan) and iPex (NSK, Tochigi, Japan) EALs.

METHODS

The working length (WL) was determined electronically for 40 root canals of human teeth with a K-file and one of the two EALs. The files were fixed at the WL, and the teeth were extracted. The apical 4 mm of each canal was trimmed to expose the file tip. The samples were observed under a scanning electron microscope, and the distance from the file tip to the point 0.5 mm coronal to the major foramen (the actual WL) was measured. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, and significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the Root ZX and iPex devices. The mean distance from the actual WL to the file tip was 0.146 ± 0.43 mm for the Root ZX and 0.128 ± 0.49 mm for the iPex. In determining the actual WL, the Root ZX was accurate 72% of the time to ± 0.5 mm and 100% of the time to ± 1 mm, whereas the iPex was accurate 57.8% of the time to ± 0.5 mm and 100% of the time to ± 1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the in vivo clinical conditions of this study, no statistically significant differences were observed between the Root ZX and iPex EALs.

摘要

简介

iPex 是一种第四代根尖定位仪(EAL),尚未在体内进行测试。本研究的目的是比较 Root ZX(日本 Morita 株式会社,东京)和 iPex(日本 NSK)EAL 的准确性。

方法

用 K 锉和两种 EAL 中的一种电子确定 40 个人类牙齿根管的工作长度(WL)。将锉固定在 WL 处,然后拔出牙齿。将每个根管的根尖 4mm 修剪以露出锉尖。将样本在扫描电子显微镜下观察,并测量从锉尖到距主要孔 0.5mm 处的点的距离(实际 WL)。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验分析数据,设定显著性水平为 P <.05。

结果

Root ZX 和 iPex 设备之间没有统计学上的显著差异。从实际 WL 到锉尖的平均距离为 Root ZX 为 0.146±0.43mm,iPex 为 0.128±0.49mm。在确定实际 WL 时,Root ZX 准确到±0.5mm 的时间为 72%,准确到±1mm 的时间为 100%,而 iPex 准确到±0.5mm 的时间为 57.8%,准确到±1mm 的时间为 100%。

结论

在本研究的体内临床条件下,Root ZX 和 iPex EAL 之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of root ZX and iPex apex locators: an in vivo study.根管 ZX 和 iPex 根尖定位仪的评估:一项体内研究。
J Endod. 2011 May;37(5):608-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
2
Comparison of in vivo and in vitro readings when testing the accuracy of the Root ZX apex locator.比较体内和体外读数时测试的准确性根 ZX 根尖定位仪。
J Endod. 2012 Feb;38(2):236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
3
In vivo evaluation of the iPex and Root ZX electronic apex locators using various irrigants.使用不同冲洗液对 iPex 和 Root ZX 电子根尖定位仪的体内评估。
Int Endod J. 2013 Aug;46(8):769-74. doi: 10.1111/iej.12057. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
4
Effectiveness of four electronic apex locators to determine distance from the apical foramen.四种电子根尖定位仪测量距根尖孔距离的准确性。
Int Endod J. 2010 Sep;43(9):808-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01765.x. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
5
Investigation of apex locators and related morphological factors.根尖定位仪及相关形态因素的研究。
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
6
Critical diameter of apical foramen and of file size using the Root ZX apex locator: an in vitro study.根尖孔及根管锉尺寸的临界直径:根尖定位仪 Root ZX 的一项体外研究。
J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1306-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
7
In vivo comparison of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators.两种电子根尖定位仪准确性的体内比较
Aust Endod J. 2011 Aug;37(2):70-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2009.00217.x. Epub 2010 May 11.
8
Accuracy and reliability of working length determination by Gold Reciproc Motor in reciprocating movement.使用金 reciproc 电机在往复运动中确定工作长度的准确性和可靠性。
J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):694-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
9
In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II.三种电子根管长度测量仪(Dentaport ZX、Raypex 5 和 ProPex II)的体内准确性。
Int Endod J. 2012 Jun;45(6):552-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.02010.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
10
Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study.三种电子根尖定位仪在前磨牙和后牙中的准确性:一项离体研究。
J Endod. 2011 May;37(5):684-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of different root canal irrigations on the accuracy of apex locators: A systematic review.不同根管冲洗液对根尖定位仪准确性的影响:一项系统评价。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Dec 1;16(12):e1538-e1546. doi: 10.4317/jced.62049. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Influence of root canal taper on the measurement of two different electronic apex locators.根管锥度对两种不同电子根尖定位仪测量的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Jun 1;16(6):e733-e739. doi: 10.4317/jced.61352. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Effect of Different Electroconductive Root Canal Irrigations on the Accuracy of Different Apex Locators: An Comparative Study.
不同导电根管冲洗液对不同根尖定位仪准确性的影响:一项对比研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024 Jun 27;14(3):211-217. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_192_23. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
4
Can ultrasonography be used to determine working length in endodontic treatment? An in vitro study.超声检查能否用于确定牙髓治疗中的工作长度?一项体外研究。
Odontology. 2024 Apr;112(2):453-459. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00858-1. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
5
Evaluation of changes in root canal length and accuracy of the electronic apex locator during different stages of endodontic treatment and retreatment.评价根管治疗和再治疗不同阶段电子根尖定位仪测量根管长度的变化及准确性。
Odontology. 2024 Apr;112(2):537-545. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00846-5. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
6
Effect of Various Electronic Devices on the Performance of Electronic Apex Locator.各种电子设备对电子根尖定位仪性能的影响
Iran Endod J. 2019 Fall;14(4):278-282. doi: 10.22037/iej.v14i4.23752.
7
Accuracy of different generations of apex locators in determining working length; a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同代根尖定位仪在确定工作长度方面的准确性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Saudi Dent J. 2022 Jan;34(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.09.020. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Ipex, Root Zx Mini, and Epex Pro Apex Locators in Teeth with Artificially Created Root Perforations in Presence of Various Intracanal Irrigants.在不同根管冲洗液存在的情况下,比较 Ipex、Root Zx Mini 和 Epex Pro Apex 根管定位仪测量有髓腔穿孔牙准确性的实验研究。
Eur Endod J. 2020 Mar 19;5(1):6-9. doi: 10.14744/eej.2019.07279. eCollection 2020.
9
Influence of calcium hydroxide residues after using different irrigants on the accuracy of two electronic apex locators: An study.使用不同冲洗剂后氢氧化钙残留对两种电子根尖定位仪准确性的影响:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Jan 21;17(1):48-53. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
10
Evaluation of electrical impedance ratio measurements in accuracy of electronic apex locators.电阻抗比率测量对电子根尖定位仪准确性的评估。
Restor Dent Endod. 2015 May;40(2):113-22. doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.2.113. Epub 2014 Dec 26.