McGaghie W C
Office of Educational Development, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599-7530.
Acad Med. 1990 Mar;65(3):136-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199003000-00002.
This article is the author's formulation of important issues concerning medical school admission: that (1) in recent years, almost all applicants who have been admitted to medical school have obtained the M.D. degree and been licensed to practice; (2) given this high success rate, an accepted applicant's economic security is virtually guaranteed; (3) the admission decision contributes directly to the formation of a highly paid, high-status professional elite; (4) the link between students' academic aptitude for medical education and their achievement in medical school is weak; (5) schools pay lip-service to the importance of students' character, motivation, and other personal qualities but continue to select students with high grades in science courses and high MCAT scores; (6) admission officers and committees often confuse selecting students with predicting their achievement in medical school; (7) two core values in American culture (self-reliance and competition) encourage the use of norm-referenced measurement in all phases of education; and (8) there are alternatives to the traditional approach to defining eligibility for professional education.
(1)近年来,几乎所有被医学院录取的申请者都获得了医学博士学位并获得了行医执照;(2)鉴于如此高的成功率,被录取申请者的经济保障实际上得到了保证;(3)录取决定直接促成了一个高薪、高地位的专业精英群体的形成;(4)学生在医学教育方面的学术能力与其在医学院的成绩之间的联系很弱;(5)学校口头上重视学生的性格、动机和其他个人品质,但继续挑选理科课程成绩高和医学院入学考试成绩高的学生;(6)招生官员和委员会常常将挑选学生与预测他们在医学院的成绩混为一谈;(7)美国文化中的两个核心价值观(自力更生和竞争)鼓励在教育的各个阶段使用常模参照测量;(8)对于界定专业教育资格的传统方法,存在其他替代方案。