• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对医学生成功至关重要的核心个人能力有哪些:它们是什么,以及如何在招生过程早期进行评估?

Core personal competencies important to entering students' success in medical school: what are they and how could they be assessed early in the admission process?

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):603-13. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b3389.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b3389
PMID:23524928
Abstract

Assessing applicants' personal competencies in the admission process has proven difficult because there is not an agreed-on set of personal competencies for entering medical students. In addition, there are questions about the measurement properties and costs of currently available assessment tools. The Association of American Medical College's Innovation Lab Working Group (ILWG) and Admissions Initiative therefore engaged in a multistep, multiyear process to identify personal competencies important to entering students' success in medical school as well as ways to measure them early in the admission process. To identify core personal competencies, they conducted literature reviews, surveyed U.S and Canadian medical school admission officers, and solicited input from the admission community. To identify tools with the potential to provide data in time for pre-interview screening, they reviewed the higher education and employment literature and evaluated tools' psychometric properties, group differences, risk of coaching/faking, likely applicant and admission officer reactions, costs, and scalability. This process resulted in a list of nine core personal competencies rated by stakeholders as very or extremely important for entering medical students: ethical responsibility to self and others; reliability and dependability; service orientation; social skills; capacity for improvement; resilience and adaptability; cultural competence; oral communication; and teamwork. The ILWG's research suggests that some tools hold promise for assessing personal competencies, but the authors caution that none are perfect for all situations. They recommend that multiple tools be used to evaluate information about applicants' personal competencies in deciding whom to interview.

摘要

在招生过程中评估申请人的个人能力一直很困难,因为没有一套公认的适用于医学生入学的个人能力标准。此外,目前可用的评估工具的测量特性和成本也存在问题。因此,美国医学院协会创新实验室工作组(ILWG)和招生倡议开展了一个多步骤、多年的过程,以确定对医学生成功入学至关重要的个人能力,以及在招生过程早期衡量这些能力的方法。为了确定核心个人能力,他们进行了文献回顾、调查了美国和加拿大医学院招生官员,并征求了招生界的意见。为了确定有潜力在面试前筛选时提供数据的工具,他们查阅了高等教育和就业文献,并评估了工具的心理测量特性、群体差异、辅导/造假风险、可能的申请人和招生官员的反应、成本和可扩展性。这一过程产生了一份由利益相关者评定的 9 项核心个人能力清单,他们认为这些能力对医学生入学非常重要:对自己和他人的道德责任;可靠性和可依赖性;服务导向;社交技能;改进能力;适应力和灵活性;文化能力;口头沟通;团队合作。ILWG 的研究表明,一些工具在评估个人能力方面具有潜力,但作者警告称,没有一种工具在所有情况下都是完美的。他们建议在决定面试谁时,使用多种工具来评估申请人个人能力的信息。

相似文献

1
Core personal competencies important to entering students' success in medical school: what are they and how could they be assessed early in the admission process?对医学生成功至关重要的核心个人能力有哪些:它们是什么,以及如何在招生过程早期进行评估?
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):603-13. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b3389.
2
A perspective on medical school admission research and practice over the last 25 years.过去25年医学院校招生研究与实践的透视
Teach Learn Med. 2013;25 Suppl 1:S50-6. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.842910.
3
An overview of the medical school admission process and use of applicant data in decision making: what has changed since the 1980s?医学专业院校招生流程概述以及招生决策中对申请人数据的运用:自 20 世纪 80 年代以来发生了哪些变化?
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):672-81. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828bf252.
4
Redesigning the MCAT exam: balancing multiple perspectives.重新设计 MCAT 考试:平衡多方观点。
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):560-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828c4ae0.
5
Faculty and students' perception about aptitude of professionalism in admission process of medical college.教师和学生对医学院招生过程中专业素养资质的看法。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011 Apr-Jun;23(2):166-9.
6
Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school.医学院入学个人素质评估。
Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):258-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02087.x.
7
[The selection process in the Faculty of Medicine: the usefulness of a psychological and aptitude assessment].[医学院的选拔过程:心理和能力评估的效用]
Clin Ter. 2013;164(1):39-42. doi: 10.7417/T.2013.1510.
8
Designing a Situational Judgment Test for Use in Medical School Admissions.设计用于医学院招生的情境判断测验。
Acad Med. 2024 Feb 1;99(2):134-138. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005471. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
9
Relationship of academic success of medical students with motivation and pre-admission grades.医学生学业成就与学习动机及入学前成绩的关系。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Jan;23(1):31-6.
10
The Effect of Differential Weighting of Academics, Experiences, and Competencies Measured by Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) on Race and Ethnicity of Cohorts Accepted to One Medical School.多迷你面试(MMI)所衡量的学术、经历和能力的差异加权对一所医学院录取学生群体的种族和民族的影响。
Acad Med. 2015 Dec;90(12):1651-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000960.

引用本文的文献

1
Spoilt for Choice in Undergraduate Medical Admission: Selection of Confident and Considerate Students Using Professional Prequalification and Situational Judgement Test.本科医学招生选择众多:通过专业预资格审查和情境判断测试选拔自信且体贴的学生
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jun 23;14(1):360-370. doi: 10.5334/pme.1571. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of Multiple Mini Interviews in medical school admissions: assessment using The Big Five Personality framework.多重迷你面试在医学院招生中的有效性:基于大五人格框架的评估
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 12;23:eAO1352. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1352. eCollection 2025.
3
Advancing health professions education: a review of holistic admissions and competency-based admissions practices.
推进健康职业教育:对整体招生和基于能力的招生实践的综述。
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2486979. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2486979. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
4
Developing institution-specific admission competency criteria for prospective health sciences students.为未来的健康科学专业学生制定特定院校的入学能力标准。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1474. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06495-8.
5
Motivations of undergraduate student medical interpreters: Exposure and experience.本科学生医学口译员的动机:接触与经验。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05417-y.
6
Investigating the internal structure of multiple mini interviews-A perspective from Pakistan.探究多站式面试的内部结构——来自巴基斯坦的视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 11;19(4):e0301365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301365. eCollection 2024.
7
Beyond Grade Point Averages and Medical College Admission Test Scores: A Thematic Analysis of Exceptional Performing Medical Student Applications.超越平均绩点和医学院入学考试成绩:对优秀医学生申请材料的主题分析
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Jun 2;10:151. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000151.1. eCollection 2021.
8
How professional and academic pre-qualifications relate to success in medical education: Results of a multicentre study in Germany.专业和学术资格与医学教育成功的关系:德国多中心研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0296982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296982. eCollection 2024.
9
Resilient responses to stressful events among chiropractic students: A cross-sectional survey.脊骨神经医学专业学生对压力事件的弹性反应:一项横断面调查。
J Chiropr Educ. 2024 Mar 4;38(1):82-95. doi: 10.7899/JCE-23-9.
10
Just World Beliefs among Medical Students and the General Public in Hawai'i.夏威夷的医学生和普通公众中的公正世界信念。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2024 Jan;83(1):10-15.