Suppr超能文献

开发和评估 CAHPS 问题,以评估医疗信息技术对门诊护理患者体验的影响。

Development and evaluation of CAHPS questions to assess the impact of health information technology on patient experiences with ambulatory care.

机构信息

VA QUERI Program and Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, ENRM VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA 01730, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S11-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182610a50.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about whether health information technology (HIT) affects patient experiences with health care.

OBJECTIVE

To develop HIT questions that assess patients care experiences not evaluated by existing ambulatory Consumer Assessment of Health Plans and Systems (CAHPS) measures.

RESEARCH DESIGN

We reviewed published articles and conducted focus groups and cognitive testing to develop survey questions. We collected data, using mail and the internet, from patients of 69 physicians receiving care at an academic medical center and 2 regional integrated delivery systems in late 2009 and 2010. We evaluated questions and scales about HIT using factor analysis, item-scale correlations, and reliability (internal consistency and physician-level) estimates.

RESULTS

We found support for 3 HIT composites: doctor use of computer (2 items), e-mail (2 items), and helpfulness of provider's website (4 items). Corrected item-scale correlations were 0.37 for the 2 doctor use of computer items and 0.71 for the 2 e-mail items, and ranged from 0.50 to 0.60 for the provider's website items. Cronbach α was high for e-mail (0.83) and provider's website (0.75), but only 0.54 for doctor use of computer. As few as 50 responses per physician would yield reliability of 0.70 for e-mail and provider's website. Two HIT composites, doctor use of computer (P<0.001) and provider's website (P=0.02), were independent predictors of overall ratings of doctors.

CONCLUSIONS

New CAHPS HIT items were identified that measure aspects of patient experiences not assessed by the CAHPS C&G 1.0 survey.

摘要

背景

对于健康信息技术(HIT)是否会影响患者的医疗体验,人们知之甚少。

目的

开发 HIT 问题,以评估现有门诊患者评估医疗计划和系统(CAHPS)措施未评估的患者护理体验。

研究设计

我们回顾了已发表的文章,并进行了焦点小组和认知测试,以开发调查问题。我们于 2009 年末和 2010 年从在学术医疗中心和 2 个区域综合交付系统接受治疗的 69 名医生的患者那里收集了使用邮件和互联网的数据。我们使用因子分析、项目-量表相关性和可靠性(内部一致性和医生水平)估计值来评估有关 HIT 的问题和量表。

结果

我们发现了 3 个 HIT 组合的支持:医生使用计算机(2 项)、电子邮件(2 项)和医生网站的有用性(4 项)。经校正的项目-量表相关性为计算机使用的 2 个医生项目的 0.37,电子邮件的 2 个项目的 0.71,而医生网站的项目则在 0.50 到 0.60 之间。电子邮件(0.83)和医生网站(0.75)的 Cronbach α 较高,但医生使用计算机的 Cronbach α 仅为 0.54。每位医生只要有 50 个响应,就可以使电子邮件和医生网站的可靠性达到 0.70。医生使用计算机(P<0.001)和医生网站(P=0.02)这两个 HIT 组合是医生总体评分的独立预测因素。

结论

确定了新的 CAHPS HIT 项目,这些项目可衡量 CAHPS C&G 1.0 调查未评估的患者体验方面。

相似文献

3
Development of and field test results for the CAHPS PCMH Survey.CAHPS PCMH 调查的开发和现场测试结果。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S2-10. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182610aba.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Randomized trial of depression follow-up care by online messaging.抑郁症在线随访的随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):698-704. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1679-8. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验