• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰城市 COPD 患者压倒性支持低剂量 CT 扫描进行肺癌筛查。

Overwhelming support among urban Irish COPD patients for lung cancer screening by low-dose CT scan.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Lung. 2012 Dec;190(6):621-8. doi: 10.1007/s00408-012-9421-9. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00408-012-9421-9
PMID:23064487
Abstract

PURPOSE

The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) has renewed interest in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer. Smokers may be less receptive toward LDCT screening, however, compared with never smokers. The views of patients with COPD, a particularly high-risk group, toward LDCT screening for lung cancer are currently unknown. We therefore evaluated attitudes of patients with COPD toward LDCT screening for lung cancer.

METHODS

Interviews with Irish patients with COPD who satisfied NLST eligibility criteria were conducted in clinical settings using a questionnaire based on that of a comparable study of U.S. current/former smokers of unspecified disease status.

RESULTS

A total of 142 subjects had a mean age of 65.09 ± 6.07 years (46.4 % were male, mean pack years 54.5 ± 33.3, mean FEV1 59.16 ± 23 %); 97.8 % had an identifiable usual source of healthcare. Compared with data from a U.S. cohort of current/former smokers, a higher proportion of Irish COPD smokers: believed that they were at risk for lung cancer (63.6 vs. 15.7 %); believed that early detection improved chances of survival (90 vs. 51.2 ); were willing to consider LDCT screening (97.9 vs. 78.6 %); were willing to pay for a LDCT scan (68.6 vs. 36.2 %); and were willing to accept treatment recommendations arising (95.7 vs. 56.2 %; p < 0.0001 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Urban Irish smokers with COPD who would be eligible for LDCT screening are almost universally in favor of being screened and treated for screening-detected lung cancers. This readily accessible high-risk population should be actively targeted in future screening programs.

摘要

目的

国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST)重新引发了人们对低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查肺癌的兴趣。然而,与从不吸烟者相比,吸烟者对 LDCT 筛查的接受程度可能较低。目前尚不清楚 COPD 患者(一个特别高风险群体)对 LDCT 筛查肺癌的看法。因此,我们评估了 COPD 患者对 LDCT 筛查肺癌的态度。

方法

在临床环境中,使用基于美国目前/以前患有未指明疾病状态的吸烟者的类似研究的问卷,对符合 NLST 入选标准的爱尔兰 COPD 患者进行了访谈。

结果

共有 142 名患者的平均年龄为 65.09 ± 6.07 岁(46.4%为男性,平均吸烟量为 54.5 ± 33.3,FEV1 平均值为 59.16 ± 23%);97.8%有可识别的常规医疗来源。与美国目前/以前吸烟者队列的数据相比,爱尔兰 COPD 吸烟者中有更高比例的人:认为自己有患肺癌的风险(63.6%比 15.7%);认为早期检测提高了生存机会(90%比 51.2%);愿意考虑 LDCT 筛查(97.9%比 78.6%);愿意支付 LDCT 扫描费用(68.6%比 36.2%);并愿意接受由此产生的治疗建议(95.7%比 56.2%;所有比较均 p<0.0001)。

结论

符合 LDCT 筛查条件的爱尔兰城市吸烟者几乎普遍赞成对其进行筛查和治疗筛查发现的肺癌。在未来的筛查计划中,应该积极针对这个容易接触到的高危人群。

相似文献

1
Overwhelming support among urban Irish COPD patients for lung cancer screening by low-dose CT scan.爱尔兰城市 COPD 患者压倒性支持低剂量 CT 扫描进行肺癌筛查。
Lung. 2012 Dec;190(6):621-8. doi: 10.1007/s00408-012-9421-9. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
2
3
Role of Low-Dose Computerized Tomography in Lung Cancer Screening among Never-Smokers.低剂量计算机断层扫描在不吸烟人群肺癌筛查中的作用。
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Mar;14(3):436-444. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence and prediction in a high-risk lung cancer screening population.高危肺癌筛查人群中的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患病率和预测。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01344-y.
5
Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Providers in New Mexico About Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.新墨西哥州初级保健提供者对使用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查的态度和信念
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jul 9;12:E108. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150112.
6
Low-dose CT screening among never-smokers with or without a family history of lung cancer in Taiwan: a prospective cohort study.台湾不吸烟人群和有肺癌家族史人群的低剂量 CT 筛查:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2024 Feb;12(2):141-152. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00338-7. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
7
Patient-Level Trajectories and Outcomes After Low-Dose CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.国家肺癌筛查试验中低剂量 CT 筛查后的患者水平轨迹和结局。
Chest. 2019 Nov;156(5):965-971. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
8
Association of Inclusion of More Black Individuals in Lung Cancer Screening With Reduced Mortality.纳入更多黑人个体进行肺癌筛查与降低死亡率相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19629.
9
Real-world Clinical Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening-Evaluating Processes to Improve Screening Guidelines-Concordance.肺癌筛查的真实世界临床实施——评估改善筛查指南一致性的流程
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1143-1152. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05539-w. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
10
The added value of hybrid ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT in patients with stable COPD or apparently healthy smokers. Cancer-suspected CT findings in the lungs are common when hybrid imaging is used.混合通气/灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)在稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者或看似健康的吸烟者中的附加价值。当使用混合成像时,肺部疑似癌症的CT表现很常见。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Dec 18;10:25-30. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S73423. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonlinear Relationship Between Age and Likelihood of Undergoing Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing, and the Predictive Factors of Testing at Different Ages.年龄与前列腺特异性抗原检测可能性之间的非线性关系,以及不同年龄进行检测的预测因素。
Am J Mens Health. 2021 May-Jun;15(3):15579883211026515. doi: 10.1177/15579883211026515.
2
Lung cancer screening: how do we make it better?肺癌筛查:我们如何做得更好?
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Feb;10(2):533-536. doi: 10.21037/qims.2020.01.08.
3
Lung cancer screening in a community setting: Characteristics, motivations, and attitudes of individuals being screened.

本文引用的文献

1
The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups.美国胸外科学会使用低剂量计算机断层扫描对肺癌幸存者和其他高危人群进行肺癌筛查的指南。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jul;144(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.060.
2
Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study.参与肺癌筛查试验的态度:一项定性研究。
Thorax. 2012 May;67(5):418-25. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200055. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
3
Screening for lung cancer: for patients at increased risk for lung cancer, it works.
社区环境中的肺癌筛查:接受筛查者的特征、动机和态度。
Health Psychol Open. 2019 Jan 3;6(1):2055102918819163. doi: 10.1177/2055102918819163. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
4
Opportunities to address lung cancer disparities among African Americans.解决非裔美国人肺癌差异问题的机遇。
Cancer Med. 2014 Dec;3(6):1467-76. doi: 10.1002/cam4.348. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
肺癌筛查:对于有肺癌风险增加的患者,它是有效的。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):540-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00367. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
4
European and North American lung cancer screening experience and implications for pulmonary nodule management.欧洲和北美的肺癌筛查经验及其对肺结节管理的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2445-54. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2219-y. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
5
Lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-- incidence and predicting factors.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺癌——发病率和预测因素。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct 15;184(8):913-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201103-0430OC.
6
Public awareness of colorectal cancer and screening in a Spanish population.公众对结直肠癌的认知及西班牙人群的筛查情况。
Public Health. 2011 Sep;125(9):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.03.014. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
7
Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查可降低肺癌死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
8
Illness representations of lung cancer, lung cancer worry, and perceptions of risk by smoking status.肺癌的疾病表征、肺癌担忧以及不同吸烟状况下的风险认知。
J Cancer Educ. 2011 Dec;26(4):747-53. doi: 10.1007/s13187-011-0247-6.
9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer: new molecular insights.慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肺癌:新的分子见解。
Respiration. 2011;81(4):265-84. doi: 10.1159/000324601. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
10
Lung cancer screening--are we there yet?肺癌筛查——我们做到了吗?
Eur J Intern Med. 2010 Feb;21(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Nov 24.