• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在实际和潜在的瑞士供者中,混合异基因-自体脐带血库的接受率很高。

High acceptance rate of hybrid allogeneic-autologous umbilical cord blood banking among actual and potential Swiss donors.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2013 Jul;53(7):1510-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03921.x. Epub 2012 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03921.x
PMID:23067293
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two competitive concepts of umbilical cord blood (UCB) banking are currently available: either allogeneic UCB is donated to a public bank or autologous cells are stored in a private bank. Allogeneic-autologous hybrid banking is a new concept that combines these two approaches. However, acceptance of hybrid UCB banking among potential donors is unknown to date.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a prospective survey, we aimed to establish the acceptance of the hybrid banking model among actual and potential UCB donors in Switzerland. The study groups consisted of parents and pregnant women with or without children. As control group, women at reproductive ages were investigated.

RESULTS

The majority of participants agreed fundamentally with UCB donation, and overall acceptance of private banking was 47%. If a possibility for hybrid banking were to be made available, 49% would opt for such a public-private model and only 13% would choose private banking alone. Among the proponents of hybrid banking, a majority of participants chose donor cell splitting over the sequential banking mode. Fifty-six percent of responders wished prior notification before the release of their donated UCB to a foreign recipient.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study which compared the acceptance of allogeneic, autologous, and hybrid allogeneic-autologous UCB banking in different target groups. We demonstrated that hybrid cord blood banking is the preferred model of banking among actual and potential UCB donors. With increasing demand for UCB in the future, health care providers should therefore consider offering hybrid banking as a viable storage option.

摘要

背景

目前有两种竞争性的脐带血(UCB)库概念:一种是异体 UCB 捐赠给公共库,另一种是自体细胞存储在私人库。异体-自体混合库是一种将这两种方法结合起来的新概念。然而,目前尚不清楚潜在供体对混合 UCB 库的接受程度。

研究设计和方法

在一项前瞻性调查中,我们旨在确定瑞士实际和潜在 UCB 供体对混合库模型的接受程度。研究组包括有或没有孩子的父母和孕妇。作为对照组,调查了生育年龄的妇女。

结果

大多数参与者从根本上同意 UCB 捐赠,总体上对私人库的接受度为 47%。如果有可能提供混合库,49%的人会选择这种公私混合模式,只有 13%的人会选择单独的私人库。在支持混合库的人中,大多数参与者选择了供体细胞分裂而不是顺序库模式。56%的应答者希望在他们捐献的 UCB 被释放给外国接受者之前得到预先通知。

结论

这是第一项在不同目标群体中比较异体、自体和混合异体-自体 UCB 库接受程度的研究。我们表明,混合脐带血库是实际和潜在 UCB 供体中首选的库模式。随着未来对 UCB 的需求增加,医疗保健提供者应考虑提供混合库作为一种可行的存储选择。

相似文献

1
High acceptance rate of hybrid allogeneic-autologous umbilical cord blood banking among actual and potential Swiss donors.在实际和潜在的瑞士供者中,混合异基因-自体脐带血库的接受率很高。
Transfusion. 2013 Jul;53(7):1510-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03921.x. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
2
Controversies in hybrid banking: attitudes of Swiss public umbilical cord blood donors toward private and public banking.混合银行的争议:瑞士公共脐带血捐赠者对私人和公共银行的态度。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jul;284(1):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1607-x. Epub 2010 Jul 24.
3
Ethical issues in umbilical cord blood banking. Working Group on Ethical Issues in Umbilical Cord Blood Banking.脐带血库中的伦理问题。脐带血库伦理问题工作组。
JAMA. 1997 Sep 17;278(11):938-43.
4
Hybrid cord blood banking in a private-public-partnership: Women's perspectives.公私合作模式下的混合脐带血库:女性的观点。
Transfusion. 2024 Jul;64(7):1270-1278. doi: 10.1111/trf.17858. Epub 2024 May 15.
5
Umbilical cord blood donation: public or private?脐带血捐献:公共还是私人的?
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Oct;50(10):1271-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.124. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
6
Knowledge, beliefs, and decisions of pregnant Australian women concerning donation and storage of umbilical cord blood: a population-based survey.澳大利亚孕妇关于脐带血捐献和储存的知识、信念及决策:一项基于人群的调查。
Birth. 2014 Dec;41(4):360-6. doi: 10.1111/birt.12121. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
7
[Umbilical cord blood transplantation: acceptance of umbilical cord blood donation by pregnant patients].[脐带血移植:孕妇对脐带血捐赠的接受情况]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1998 May 2;128(18):689-95.
8
Are hybrid umbilical cord blood banks really the best of both worlds?混合脐带血库真的是两全其美吗?
J Med Ethics. 2015 Mar;41(3):272-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101673. Epub 2014 May 13.
9
[Umbilical cord blood as a source of stem cells].[脐带血作为干细胞的来源]
Acta Med Croatica. 2006 Jun;60(3):215-25.
10
Umbilical cord blood banks. Ethical aspects. Public versus private banks.脐带血库。伦理问题。公共库与私人库。
Cuad Bioet. 2012 May-Aug;23(78):269-85.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives for the Use of Umbilical Cord Blood in Transplantation and Beyond: Initiatives for an Advanced and Sustainable Public Banking Program in Greece.脐带血在移植及其他领域的应用前景:希腊先进且可持续公共库项目的倡议
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 18;13(4):1152. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041152.
2
Hybrid umbilical cord blood banking: literature review.混合脐血库:文献综述。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jan;309(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07003-x. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
Factors Influencing the Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Industry: An Evolving Treatment Landscape.
影响脐带血干细胞产业的因素:不断变化的治疗前景。
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018 Sep;7(9):643-650. doi: 10.1002/sctm.17-0244. Epub 2018 May 18.
4
Health care professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to umbilical cord blood banking and donation: an integrative review.医疗保健专业人员关于脐带血库存储与捐赠的知识、态度及实践:一项综合综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 19;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0863-6.
5
A Need for Renewed and Cohesive US Policy on Cord Blood Banking.需要更新和统一的美国脐血银行政策。
Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2015 Dec;11(6):789-97. doi: 10.1007/s12015-015-9613-9.
6
Umbilical cord blood donation: public or private?脐带血捐献:公共还是私人的?
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Oct;50(10):1271-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.124. Epub 2015 Jun 1.