Division of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Arizona Respiratory Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724-5163, USA.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Dec;130(6):1317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.031. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
Viral upper respiratory tract infections have been implicated as a major cause of asthma exacerbations among school-aged children. Regular hand washing is the most effective method to prevent the spread of viral respiratory tract infections, but effective hand-washing practices are difficult to establish in schools.
This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether a standardized regimen of hand washing plus alcohol-based hand sanitizer could reduce asthma exacerbations more than schools' usual hand hygiene practices.
This was a 2-year, community-based, randomized controlled crossover trial. Schools were randomized to usual care and then intervention (sequence 1) or intervention and then usual care (sequence 2). Intervention schools were provided with alcohol-based hand sanitizer, hand soap, and hand hygiene education. The primary outcome was the proportion of students experiencing an asthma exacerbation each month. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the difference in the marginal rate of exacerbations between sequences while controlling for individual demographic factors and the correlation within each student and between students within each school.
Five hundred twenty-seven students with asthma were enrolled among 31 schools. The hand hygiene intervention did not reduce the number of asthma exacerbations compared with the schools' usual hand hygiene practices (P = .132). There was a strong temporal trend because both sequences experienced fewer exacerbations during year 2 compared with year 1 (P < .001).
Although the intervention was not found to be effective, the results were confounded by the H1N1 influenza pandemic that resulted in substantially increased hand hygiene behaviors and resources in usual-care schools. Therefore these results should be viewed cautiously.
病毒引起的上呼吸道感染已被认为是导致学龄儿童哮喘发作的主要原因。经常洗手是预防病毒呼吸道感染传播的最有效方法,但在学校中很难建立有效的洗手习惯。
本随机对照试验评估了标准化洗手加酒精基手部消毒剂方案是否比学校常规的手部卫生措施更能减少哮喘发作。
这是一项为期 2 年的基于社区的随机对照交叉试验。学校被随机分为常规护理组和干预组(序列 1)或干预组和常规护理组(序列 2)。干预学校提供酒精基手部消毒剂、肥皂和手部卫生教育。主要结局是每个月经历哮喘加重的学生比例。使用广义估计方程来模拟序列之间哮喘恶化的边际发生率差异,同时控制个体人口统计学因素以及每个学生内部和每个学校内学生之间的相关性。
在 31 所学校中招募了 527 名哮喘学生。与学校常规手部卫生措施相比,手部卫生干预并未减少哮喘发作次数(P=0.132)。存在强烈的时间趋势,因为两个序列在第 2 年比第 1 年少发生哮喘加重(P<0.001)。
尽管干预措施未被证明有效,但由于 H1N1 流感大流行导致常规护理学校的手部卫生行为和资源大幅增加,结果受到了混淆。因此,这些结果应谨慎看待。