Suppr超能文献

基于学校的手部卫生计划能否减少小学生哮喘恶化?

Can a school-based hand hygiene program reduce asthma exacerbations among elementary school children?

机构信息

Division of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Arizona Respiratory Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724-5163, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Dec;130(6):1317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.031. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Viral upper respiratory tract infections have been implicated as a major cause of asthma exacerbations among school-aged children. Regular hand washing is the most effective method to prevent the spread of viral respiratory tract infections, but effective hand-washing practices are difficult to establish in schools.

OBJECTIVES

This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether a standardized regimen of hand washing plus alcohol-based hand sanitizer could reduce asthma exacerbations more than schools' usual hand hygiene practices.

METHODS

This was a 2-year, community-based, randomized controlled crossover trial. Schools were randomized to usual care and then intervention (sequence 1) or intervention and then usual care (sequence 2). Intervention schools were provided with alcohol-based hand sanitizer, hand soap, and hand hygiene education. The primary outcome was the proportion of students experiencing an asthma exacerbation each month. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the difference in the marginal rate of exacerbations between sequences while controlling for individual demographic factors and the correlation within each student and between students within each school.

RESULTS

Five hundred twenty-seven students with asthma were enrolled among 31 schools. The hand hygiene intervention did not reduce the number of asthma exacerbations compared with the schools' usual hand hygiene practices (P = .132). There was a strong temporal trend because both sequences experienced fewer exacerbations during year 2 compared with year 1 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the intervention was not found to be effective, the results were confounded by the H1N1 influenza pandemic that resulted in substantially increased hand hygiene behaviors and resources in usual-care schools. Therefore these results should be viewed cautiously.

摘要

背景

病毒引起的上呼吸道感染已被认为是导致学龄儿童哮喘发作的主要原因。经常洗手是预防病毒呼吸道感染传播的最有效方法,但在学校中很难建立有效的洗手习惯。

目的

本随机对照试验评估了标准化洗手加酒精基手部消毒剂方案是否比学校常规的手部卫生措施更能减少哮喘发作。

方法

这是一项为期 2 年的基于社区的随机对照交叉试验。学校被随机分为常规护理组和干预组(序列 1)或干预组和常规护理组(序列 2)。干预学校提供酒精基手部消毒剂、肥皂和手部卫生教育。主要结局是每个月经历哮喘加重的学生比例。使用广义估计方程来模拟序列之间哮喘恶化的边际发生率差异,同时控制个体人口统计学因素以及每个学生内部和每个学校内学生之间的相关性。

结果

在 31 所学校中招募了 527 名哮喘学生。与学校常规手部卫生措施相比,手部卫生干预并未减少哮喘发作次数(P=0.132)。存在强烈的时间趋势,因为两个序列在第 2 年比第 1 年少发生哮喘加重(P<0.001)。

结论

尽管干预措施未被证明有效,但由于 H1N1 流感大流行导致常规护理学校的手部卫生行为和资源大幅增加,结果受到了混淆。因此,这些结果应谨慎看待。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Interventions for autumn exacerbations of asthma in children.儿童秋季哮喘加重的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 8;3(3):CD012393. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012393.pub2.
5
Promising approaches for the treatment and prevention of viral respiratory illnesses.治疗和预防病毒性呼吸道疾病的有前景的方法。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Oct;140(4):921-932. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Recent advances in environmental controls outside the home setting.家庭环境之外环境控制的最新进展。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr;16(2):135-41. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000250.
9
A Systematic Review of School-Based Alcohol and other Drug Prevention Programs.一项关于校内酒精及其他药物预防项目的系统评价
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2015 Feb 26;11(Suppl 1 M6):102-12. doi: 10.2174/1745017901511010102. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

9
Inspections of hand washing supplies and hand sanitizer in public schools.公立学校洗手用品和洗手液的检查。
J Sch Nurs. 2010 Oct;26(5):393-7. doi: 10.1177/1059840510370328. Epub 2010 May 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验