Suppr超能文献

使用不同靶距、曝光时间及改良铝梯楔评估复合树脂修复材料的X线阻射性。

Assessment of radiopacity of restorative composite resins with various target distances and exposure times and a modified aluminum step wedge.

作者信息

Poorsattar Bejeh Mir Arash, Poorsattar Bejeh Mir Morvarid

机构信息

Dentistry Student Research Committee (DSRC), Dental Materials Research Center, Dentistry School, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

出版信息

Imaging Sci Dent. 2012 Sep;42(3):163-7. doi: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.3.163. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

ANSI/ADA has established standards for adequate radiopacity. This study was aimed to assess the changes in radiopacity of composite resins according to various tube-target distances and exposure times.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five 1-mm thick samples of Filtek P60 and Clearfil composite resins were prepared and exposed with six tube-target distance/exposure time setups (i.e., 40 cm, 0.2 seconds; 30 cm, 0.2 seconds; 30 cm, 0.16 seconds, 30 cm, 0.12 seconds; 15 cm, 0.2 seconds; 15 cm, 0.12 seconds) performing at 70 kVp and 7 mA along with a 12-step aluminum stepwedge (1 mm incremental steps) using a PSP digital sensor. Thereafter, the radiopacities measured with Digora for Windows software 2.5 were converted to absorbencies (i.e., A=-log (1-G/255)), where A is the absorbency and G is the measured gray scale). Furthermore, the linear regression model of aluminum thickness and absorbency was developed and used to convert the radiopacity of dental materials to the equivalent aluminum thickness. In addition, all calculations were compared with those obtained from a modified 3-step stepwedge (i.e., using data for the 2nd, 5th, and 8th steps).

RESULTS

The radiopacities of the composite resins differed significantly with various setups (p<0.001) and between the materials (p<0.001). The best predicted model was obtained for the 30 cm 0.2 seconds setup (R(2)=0.999). Data from the reduced modified stepwedge was remarkable and comparable with the 12-step stepwedge.

CONCLUSION

Within the limits of the present study, our findings support that various setups might influence the radiopacity of dental materials on digital radiographs.

摘要

目的

美国国家标准学会/美国牙科协会(ANSI/ADA)已制定了足够的射线不透性标准。本研究旨在评估根据不同的管靶距离和曝光时间,复合树脂的射线不透性变化。

材料与方法

制备了五个1毫米厚的Filtek P60和Clearfil复合树脂样本,并使用PSP数字传感器在70 kVp和7 mA的条件下,与一个12步的铝阶梯楔(1毫米递增步长)一起,按照六种管靶距离/曝光时间设置(即40厘米,0.2秒;30厘米,0.2秒;30厘米,0.16秒,30厘米,0.12秒;15厘米,0.2秒;15厘米,0.12秒)进行曝光。此后,使用Digora for Windows软件2.5测量的射线不透性被转换为吸光度(即A = -log(1 - G/255)),其中A是吸光度,G是测量的灰度)。此外,建立了铝厚度和吸光度的线性回归模型,并用于将牙科材料的射线不透性转换为等效铝厚度。另外,所有计算结果都与从改良的三步阶梯楔(即使用第2、5和8步的数据)获得的结果进行了比较。

结果

复合树脂的射线不透性在不同设置下(p<0.001)以及材料之间(p<0.001)存在显著差异。对于30厘米0.2秒的设置,获得了最佳预测模型(R(2)=0.999)。简化改良阶梯楔的数据很显著,并且与12步阶梯楔的数据相当。

结论

在本研究的范围内,我们的研究结果支持不同的设置可能会影响数字X线片上牙科材料的射线不透性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84e5/3465758/cbdab527d05f/isd-42-163-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验