Department of Psychology, Julius Maximilians University, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.
Learn Mem. 2012 Oct 16;19(11):518-26. doi: 10.1101/lm.026864.112.
Two things are worth remembering about an aversive event: What made it happen? What made it cease? If a stimulus precedes an aversive event, it becomes a signal for threat and will later elicit behavior indicating conditioned fear. However, if the stimulus is presented upon cessation of the aversive event, it elicits behavior indicating conditioned "relief." What are the neuronal bases for such learning? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in humans we found that a fear-conditioned stimulus activates amygdala but not striatum, whereas a relief-conditioned stimulus activates striatum but not amygdala. Correspondingly, acute inactivation of amygdala or of ventral striatum in rats respectively abolished only conditioned fear or only conditioned relief. Thus, the behaviorally opponent memories supported by onset and offset of aversive events engage and require fear and reward networks, respectively. This may explain attraction to stimuli associated with the cessation of trauma or of panic attacks.
是什么导致了它的发生?是什么导致了它的停止?如果一个刺激在一个厌恶事件之前出现,它就成为了威胁的信号,以后会引起表示条件性恐惧的行为。然而,如果刺激在厌恶事件停止时出现,它会引起表示条件性“缓解”的行为。这种学习的神经元基础是什么?我们使用人类功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)发现,恐惧条件刺激激活杏仁核而不激活纹状体,而缓解条件刺激则激活纹状体而不激活杏仁核。相应地,在大鼠中急性抑制杏仁核或腹侧纹状体分别只消除了条件性恐惧或条件性缓解。因此,由厌恶事件的开始和结束支持的行为相反的记忆分别涉及并需要恐惧和奖励网络。这可以解释为什么人们会被与创伤或惊恐发作停止相关的刺激所吸引。