Ellis Jayne, Rafi Imran, Smith Helen, Sheikh Aziz
Academic FY2 in General Practice, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Mar;22(1):19-22. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00087.
There are ongoing concerns about the quality of care provision for allergy in primary care.
To identify current training provision in allergy to GP trainees and to understand how this could be enhanced.
A cross-sectional survey of GP Speciality Training (GPST) programme directors was undertaken. Programme directors of the 174 GPST schemes were sent an online questionnaire which was informed by the content of the Royal College of General Practitioners curriculum. Quantitative data were descriptively analysed and a thematic analysis was undertaken of free text responses.
We obtained responses from 146 directors representing 106 training programmes. Responses indicated that two-thirds (62%, 95% CI 53.1 to 71.5) of programmes were providing at least some allergy training, with the remaining third stating that they either provided no training or were unsure. Overall, one-third (33%, 95% CI 22.7 to 42.2) of programme directors believed that all the relevant allergy-related curriculum requirements were being met. Where provided, this training was believed to be best for organ-specific allergic disorders but was thought to be poorer for systemic allergic disorders, particularly food allergy where 67% (95% CI 57.5 to 76.5) of respondents indicated that training was poor. There was considerable interest in increasing the allergy training provided, preferably through eLearning modules and problem-based learning materials supported by those with relevant specialist knowledge.
This UK-wide survey has identified important gaps in the training of GP trainees in relation to allergy care. Addressing these gaps, particularly in the management of systemic allergic disorders, should help to improve delivery of primary care-based allergy care.
基层医疗中过敏症护理的质量一直备受关注。
确定当前针对全科医生培训学员的过敏症培训情况,并了解如何加强培训。
对全科医生专科培训(GPST)项目主任进行了横断面调查。向174个GPST计划的项目主任发送了一份在线问卷,问卷内容参考了皇家全科医师学院课程的内容。对定量数据进行描述性分析,并对自由文本回复进行主题分析。
我们收到了代表106个培训项目的146位主任的回复。回复表明,三分之二(62%,95%可信区间53.1至71.5)的项目至少提供了一些过敏症培训,其余三分之一表示他们要么没有提供培训,要么不确定。总体而言,三分之一(33%,95%可信区间22.7至42.2)的项目主任认为所有相关的过敏症相关课程要求都得到了满足。在提供培训的地方,人们认为这种培训对器官特异性过敏性疾病最有帮助,但对全身性过敏性疾病的培训效果较差,特别是食物过敏,67%(95%可信区间57.5至76.5)的受访者表示培训效果不佳。人们对增加过敏症培训有很大兴趣,最好通过电子学习模块和由相关专家知识人员支持的基于问题的学习材料来实现。
这项全英国范围的调查发现了全科医生培训学员在过敏症护理培训方面的重要差距。解决这些差距,特别是在全身性过敏性疾病的管理方面,应该有助于改善基于基层医疗的过敏症护理服务。