Suppr超能文献

需要急诊或住院的癫痫未控制患者的负担。

Burden of uncontrolled epilepsy in patients requiring an emergency room visit or hospitalization.

机构信息

GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

Neurology. 2012 Oct 30;79(18):1908-16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318271f77e. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the clinical and economic burden of uncontrolled epilepsy in patients requiring emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization.

METHODS

Health insurance claims from a 5-state Medicaid database (1997Q1-2009Q2) and 55 self-insured US companies ("employer," 1999Q1 and 2008Q4) were analyzed. Adult patients with epilepsy receiving antiepileptic drugs (AED) were selected. Using a retrospective matched-cohort design, patients were categorized into cohorts of "uncontrolled" (≥ 2 changes in AED therapy, then ≥ 1 epilepsy-related ED visit/hospitalization within 1 year) and "well-controlled" (no AED change, no epilepsy-related ED visit/hospitalization) epilepsy. Matched cohorts were compared for health care resource utilization and costs using multivariate conditional regression models and nonparametric methods.

RESULTS

From 110,312 (Medicaid) and 36,529 (employer) eligible patients, 3,454 and 602 with uncontrolled epilepsy were matched 1:1 to patients with well-controlled epilepsy, respectively. In both populations, uncontrolled epilepsy cohorts presented about 2 times more fractures and head injuries (all p values < 0.0001) and higher health care resource utilization (ranges of adjusted incidence rate ratios [IRRs] [all-cause utilization]: AEDs = 1.8-1.9, non-AEDs = 1.3-1.5, hospitalizations = 5.4-6.7, length of hospital stays = 7.3-7.7, ED visits = 3.7-5.0, outpatient visits = 1.4-1.7, neurologist visits = 2.3-3.1; all p values < 0.0001) than well-controlled groups. Total direct health care costs were higher in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy (adjusted cost difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] Medicaid = $12,258 [$10,482-$14,083]; employer = $14,582 [$12,019-$17,097]) vs well-controlled patients. Privately insured employees with uncontrolled epilepsy lost 2.5 times more work days, with associated indirect costs of $2,857 (95% CI $1,042-$4,581).

CONCLUSIONS

Uncontrolled epilepsy in patients requiring ED visit or hospitalization was associated with significantly greater health care resource utilization and increased direct and indirect costs compared to well-controlled epilepsy in both publicly and privately insured settings.

摘要

目的

量化需要急诊就诊或住院的癫痫患者的未控制癫痫的临床和经济负担。

方法

分析了来自 5 个州的医疗补助数据库(1997Q1-2009Q2)和 55 家自营的美国公司(“雇主”,1999Q1 和 2008Q4)的健康保险索赔。选择了正在服用抗癫痫药物(AED)的癫痫成年患者。使用回顾性匹配队列设计,将患者分为“未控制”(≥2 次 AED 治疗改变,然后 1 年内≥1 次癫痫相关急诊就诊/住院)和“控制良好”(无 AED 改变,无癫痫相关急诊就诊/住院)癫痫队列。使用多变量条件回归模型和非参数方法比较了匹配队列的医疗资源利用和成本。

结果

在符合条件的 110312 名(医疗补助)和 36529 名(雇主)患者中,3454 名和 602 名未控制癫痫患者分别与控制良好的癫痫患者匹配 1:1。在这两个人群中,未控制癫痫组的骨折和头部损伤发生率均高出两倍以上(所有 p 值均<0.0001),且医疗资源利用率更高(所有原因调整后的发病率比 [IRR] [AEDs]:1.8-1.9,非 AEDs:1.3-1.5,住院:5.4-6.7,住院时间:7.3-7.7,急诊就诊:3.7-5.0,门诊就诊:1.4-1.7,神经内科就诊:2.3-3.1;所有 p 值均<0.0001)。与控制良好的组相比,未控制癫痫患者的直接医疗总费用更高(医疗补助调整后的成本差异 [95%置信区间(CI)]:12258 美元 [10482-14083];雇主:14582 美元 [12019-17097])。未控制癫痫的私人保险员工失去了 2.5 倍的工作天数,间接成本为 2857 美元(95%CI 1042-4581)。

结论

与控制良好的癫痫相比,需要急诊就诊或住院的癫痫患者的未控制癫痫与医疗资源利用显著增加以及直接和间接成本增加相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验