• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疑似发作的患者经救护车转院时,非首次发作的严重程度不如首次发作紧急。

Non-1st seizure was less severe than 1st seizure with non-urgent level among suspected seizures transferred by ambulance.

机构信息

Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.

Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 29;18(8):e0290783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290783. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0290783
PMID:37643171
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10464987/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To prioritize emergency medical calls for ambulance transport for patients with suspected seizures, information about whether the event is their 1st or non-1st seizure is important. However, little is known about the difference between 1st and non-1st seizures in terms of severity. We hypothesized that patients transferred multiple times (≥2 times) would represent a milder scenario than patients on their first transfer. The purpose of this study was to compare patients with suspected seizures on 1st transfer by ambulance and patients who had been transferred ≥2 times.

METHODS

We statistically compared severity of suspected seizures between two groups of patients with suspected seizures transferred between December 2014 and November 2019 (before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic) to our facility by ambulance for either the first time (1st Group) or at least the second time (Non-1st Group). Severity categories were defined as: Level 1 = life-threatening; Level 2 = emergent, needing admission to the intensive care unit; Level 3 = urgent, needing admission to a hospital general ward; Level 4 = less urgent, needing intervention but not hospitalization; and Level 5 = non-urgent, not needing intervention.

RESULTS

Among 5996 patients with suspected seizures conveyed to the emergency department by ambulance a total of 14,263 times during the study period, 1222 times (8.6%) and 636 patients (11%) met the criteria. Severity grade of suspected seizures ranged from 1 to 5 (median, 4; interquartile range, 3-4) for the 1st Group and from 1 to 5 (median, 5; interquartile range, 4-5) for the Non-1st Group. Most severe grade ranged from 1 to 5 (median, 4; interquartile range, 4-5) for the Non-1st Group. Severity grade differed significantly between groups (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression tests also suggested a significant difference (p < 0.001) in severity grades.

CONCLUSION

In direct comparisons, grade of suspected seizure severity was lower in the Non-1st Group than in the 1st Group.

摘要

背景

为了优先为疑似癫痫发作的患者安排救护车转运,了解事件是否为首次发作或非首次发作的相关信息非常重要。然而,关于首次发作和非首次发作的严重程度,我们知之甚少。我们假设,多次(≥2 次)转运的患者代表了比首次转运的患者更轻微的情况。本研究的目的是比较首次通过救护车转运的疑似癫痫发作患者和至少转运 2 次的疑似癫痫发作患者。

方法

我们对 2014 年 12 月至 2019 年 11 月(新冠疫情前)期间因疑似癫痫发作由救护车转运至我院的两组患者进行了统计学比较。一组为首次转运(第 1 组),另一组为至少转运 2 次(非首次转运组)。严重程度分类为:1 级=危及生命;2 级=紧急,需要入住重症监护病房;3 级=紧急,需要入住医院普通病房;4 级=不紧急,需要干预但不需要住院;5 级=不紧急,不需要干预。

结果

在研究期间,共有 5996 例疑似癫痫发作患者通过救护车共转运 14263 次,其中 1222 次(8.6%)和 636 例(11%)符合标准。第 1 组疑似癫痫发作的严重程度等级为 1-5(中位数,4;四分位间距,3-4),非首次组为 1-5(中位数,5;四分位间距,4-5)。最严重的等级为 1-5(中位数,4;四分位间距,4-5),非首次组。两组间严重程度等级差异有统计学意义(p<0.001,Mann-Whitney U 检验)。单因素和多因素逻辑回归检验也表明严重程度等级存在显著差异(p<0.001)。

结论

在直接比较中,非首次组疑似癫痫发作严重程度低于首次组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99db/10464987/c5bbd501883a/pone.0290783.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99db/10464987/c5bbd501883a/pone.0290783.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99db/10464987/c5bbd501883a/pone.0290783.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Non-1st seizure was less severe than 1st seizure with non-urgent level among suspected seizures transferred by ambulance.疑似发作的患者经救护车转院时,非首次发作的严重程度不如首次发作紧急。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 29;18(8):e0290783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290783. eCollection 2023.
2
Cross-sectional study of the prehospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC1).成年疑似癫痫发作患者的院前管理横断面研究(EPIC1)。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 23;6(2):e010573. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010573.
3
A data linkage study of suspected seizures in the urgent and emergency care system in the UK.英国急救和紧急护理系统中疑似癫痫发作的数据分析研究。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Oct;37(10):605-610. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208820. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
4
'Knowledge exchange' workshops to optimise development of a risk prediction tool to assist conveyance decisions for suspected seizures - Part of the Risk of ADverse Outcomes after a Suspected Seizure (RADOSS) project.“知识交流”研讨会,旨在优化风险预测工具的开发,以辅助疑似癫痫发作的转运决策——疑似癫痫发作后不良结局风险(RADOSS)项目的一部分。
Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Feb;151:109611. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109611. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
5
Supporting the ambulance service to safely convey fewer patients to hospital by developing a risk prediction tool: Risk of Adverse Outcomes after a Suspected Seizure (RADOSS)-protocol for the mixed-methods observational RADOSS project.开发风险预测工具,支持救护车服务安全地将更少的患者送往医院:疑似癫痫发作后不良结局风险(RADOSS)-混合方法观察性 RADOSS 项目方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 14;12(11):e069156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069156.
6
Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2).成年疑似癫痫发作患者医院管理的横断面研究(EPIC2)
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e015696. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015696.
7
Outcomes for Patients Who Contact the Emergency Ambulance Service and Are Not Transported to the Emergency Department: A Data Linkage Study.未被送往急诊科的拨打急救车服务电话的患者的结局:一项数据链接研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Jul-Aug;23(4):566-577. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1549628. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
8
Have the Diagnoses of Patients Transported by Ambulances Changed in the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic?救护车转运患者的诊断在 COVID-19 大流行早期是否发生了变化?
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Feb;37(1):4-11. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21001229. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
9
Admission and Discharge Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department.救护车转送至急诊科后的收治与出院。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jan 14;289:418-421. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210947.
10
Impacts of an EMS Hospital Liaison Program on Ambulance Offload Times: A Preliminary Analysis.EMS 医院联络计划对救护车下车时间的影响:初步分析。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Feb;37(1):45-50. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X2100128X. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Methodologies and Outcome Measures of Mobile Integrated Health-Community Paramedicine Programs.移动整合健康-社区急救医疗项目的方法学和结果测量的系统评价。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(1):168-178. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2138654. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
2
Common infectious and parasitic diseases as a cause of seizures: geographic distribution and contribution to the burden of epilepsy.常见感染性和寄生虫性疾病导致的癫痫发作:地理分布及对癫痫负担的影响。
Epileptic Disord. 2022 Dec 1;24(6):994-1019. doi: 10.1684/epd.2022.1491.
3
Surgical hematoma evacuation of cortical intracerebral hemorrhage ≥10 ml reduces risk of subsequent epilepsy by more than 70%: A retrospective monocenter study.
皮层脑内血肿>10 ml 的手术血肿清除术可使随后发生癫痫的风险降低 70%以上:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2023 Jul;30(7):2099-2105. doi: 10.1111/ene.15577. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Seizure first aid for people with epilepsy: opinions and knowledge of caregivers and healthcare professionals.癫痫患者发作的急救:照顾者和医疗保健专业人员的意见和知识。
Seizure. 2022 Nov;102:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
Improved understanding of non-epileptic seizures and reduced emergency health care usage following a single psychoeducational group for children and their parents.在为儿童及其父母举办一次心理教育小组活动后,对非癫痫性发作的理解得到改善,同时急诊医疗服务的使用也有所减少。
Seizure. 2022 Oct;101:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
6
Early seizures in stroke - frequency, risk factors, and effect on patient outcomes in a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家三级中心的中风早期发作——频率、危险因素及对患者预后的影响。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2022 Apr;27(2):104-110. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2022.2.20210144.
7
Public awareness of first-aid management of seizures in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯公众对癫痫发作急救管理的认知。
Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Apr;129:108634. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108634. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
8
Effect of habits, traditions, and beliefs on seizure diagnosis and provide first aid in Taif city, KSA.习惯、传统和信仰对沙特阿拉伯王国塔伊夫市癫痫发作诊断及急救的影响
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Aug;10(8):3029-3033. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_126_21. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
9
Recommendations for development of acute seizure action plans (ASAPs) from an expert panel.专家小组关于制定急性癫痫发作行动计划(ASAPs)的建议。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Oct;123:108264. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108264. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
10
Status epilepticus and COVID-19: A systematic review.癫痫持续状态与 COVID-19:系统综述。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 May;118:107887. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107887. Epub 2021 Mar 17.