Department of Chemistry, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, Wyoming 82072, United States.
Anal Chem. 2012 Nov 20;84(22):9971-80. doi: 10.1021/ac302375e. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
A study is presented on the reproducibility of mass spectral profiles of the whole bacterium E. coli resulting from laser sampling at different regions within and between matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) samples deposited onto the plate. Samples were prepared with different deposition methods and using different MALDI matrices. The three most common matrices used in MALDI-mass spectrometry (MS) bacteria profiling, α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA), sinapinic acid (SA), and ferulic acid (FA), were compared in this study along with two pipet-based sample deposition methods, dried-droplet and premix. Sample variability was determined by analysis of variances (ANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA), and multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA). For the two pipet-based sample deposition methods tested in this study, the intrasample variability (most commonly referred to as "spot-to-spot" reproducibility) was of the same magnitude as the intersample variability for all MALDI matrices tested. By incorporating a spray nebulizer sample deposition method to produce uniform sample/matrix mixtures onto the MALDI plate, we demonstrate that the crystalline morphology of the MALDI sample greatly influences the intrasample reproducibility (i.e., spot-to-spot) of the resulting whole cell MALDI-MS profiles. Overall, for the pipet-based deposition methods, results showed that the smallest variability in bacteria MALDI mass spectral profiles was obtained from samples deposited using the premix method, regardless of the MALDI matrix used, with the best reproducibility obtained with the CHCA matrix. It is concluded that a sample preparation strategy that reduces or eliminates the MALDI matrix morphology heterogeneity can reduce variability (i.e., spot-to-spot) of the bacteria mass spectral profiles by up to 90%.
本研究探讨了激光在基质辅助激光解吸电离(MALDI)样品不同区域采样时,整个细菌大肠杆菌的质谱图谱重现性。样品采用不同的沉积方法和 MALDI 基质制备。本研究比较了 MALDI 质谱细菌分析中最常用的三种基质,即α-氰基-4-羟基肉桂酸(CHCA)、芥子酸(SA)和阿魏酸(FA),以及两种基于移液器的样品沉积方法,即干液滴法和预混法。通过方差分析(ANOVA)、主成分分析(PCA)和多变量方差分析(MANOVA)来确定样品的可变性。对于本研究中测试的两种基于移液器的样品沉积方法,所有测试的 MALDI 基质的样品内变异性(通常称为“点与点”重现性)与样品间变异性相当。通过引入喷雾雾化器样品沉积方法,将均匀的样品/基质混合物制备到 MALDI 板上,我们证明 MALDI 样品的结晶形态对所得全细胞 MALDI-MS 图谱的样品内重现性(即点与点)有很大影响。总体而言,对于基于移液器的沉积方法,结果表明,无论使用何种 MALDI 基质,使用预混法沉积的样品的细菌 MALDI 质谱图谱的变异性最小,CHCA 基质的重现性最好。研究结论认为,减少或消除 MALDI 基质形态异质性的样品制备策略可以将细菌质谱图谱的变异性(即点与点)降低多达 90%。