Suppr超能文献

拔管后吞咽困难的诊断和治疗:一项全国性调查的结果。

Diagnosis and treatment of post-extubation dysphagia: results from a national survey.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.07.016. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study sought to determine the utilization of speech-language pathologist (SLPs) for the diagnosis and treatment of post-extubation dysphagia in survivors of mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

We designed, validated, and mailed a survey to 1,966 inpatient SLPs who routinely evaluate patients for post-extubation dysphagia.

RESULTS

Most SLP diagnostic evaluations (60%; 95% CI, 59%-62%) were performed using clinical techniques with uncertain accuracy. Instrumental diagnostic tests (such as fluoroscopy and endoscopy) are more likely to be available at university than community hospitals. After adjusting for hospital size and academic affiliation, instrumental test use varied significantly by geographical region. Treatments for post-extubation dysphagia usually involved dietary adjustment (76%; 95% CI, 73-79%) and postural changes/compensatory maneuvers (86%; 95% CI, 84-88%), rather than on interventions aimed to improve swallowing function (24%; 95% CI, 21-27%).

CONCLUSIONS

SLPs frequently evaluate acute respiratory failure survivors. However, diagnostic evaluations rely mainly upon bedside techniques with uncertain accuracy. The use of instrumental tests varies by geographic location and university affiliation. Current diagnostic practices and feeding decisions for critically ill patients should be viewed with caution until further studies determine the accuracy of bedside detection methods.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定言语语言病理学家(SLP)在机械通气后拔管后吞咽困难幸存者的诊断和治疗中的应用。

方法

我们设计、验证并邮寄了一份调查给 1966 名经常评估拔管后吞咽困难的住院 SLP。

结果

大多数 SLP 诊断评估(60%;95%CI,59%-62%)是使用准确性不确定的临床技术进行的。仪器诊断测试(如透视和内窥镜检查)在大学医院比社区医院更有可能获得。在调整医院规模和学术隶属关系后,仪器测试的使用因地理位置而异。拔管后吞咽困难的治疗通常涉及饮食调整(76%;95%CI,73-79%)和姿势改变/代偿性手法(86%;95%CI,84-88%),而不是针对改善吞咽功能的干预措施(24%;95%CI,21-27%)。

结论

SLP 经常评估急性呼吸衰竭幸存者。然而,诊断评估主要依赖于准确性不确定的床边技术。仪器测试的使用因地理位置和大学隶属关系而异。在进一步研究确定床边检测方法的准确性之前,应谨慎看待目前对危重症患者的诊断实践和喂养决策。

相似文献

3
Telehealth Stroke Dysphagia Evaluation Is Safe and Effective.远程医疗卒中吞咽功能评估安全有效。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;44(3-4):225-231. doi: 10.1159/000478107. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
4
Evaluation of Swallow Function Post-Extubation: Is It Necessary to Wait 24 Hours?拔管后吞咽功能评估:有必要等待24小时吗?
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019 Jul;128(7):619-624. doi: 10.1177/0003489419836115. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

4
Postorotracheal intubation dysphagia in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective study.COVID-19 患者气管插管后吞咽困难:一项回顾性研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2024 May 24;142(6):e2022608. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0608.R3.14032024. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验