Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, 300 George St, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Diabetologia. 2013 Feb;56(2):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2753-4. Epub 2012 Oct 21.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 1 diabetes results from a chronic autoimmune process continuing for years after presentation. We tested whether treatment with teplizumab (a Fc receptor non-binding anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody), after the new-onset period, affects the decline in C-peptide production in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
In a randomised placebo-controlled trial we treated 58 participants with type 1 diabetes for 4-12 months with teplizumab or placebo at four academic centres in the USA. A central randomisation centre used computer generated tables to allocate treatments. Investigators, patients, and caregivers were blinded to group assignment. The primary outcome was a comparison of C-peptide responses to a mixed meal after 1 year. We explored modification of treatment effects in subgroups of patients.
Thirty-four and 29 subjects were randomized to the drug and placebo treated groups, respectively. Thirty-one and 27, respectively, were analysed. Although the primary outcome analysis showed a 21.7% higher C-peptide response in the teplizumab-treated group (0.45 vs 0.371; difference, 0.059 [95% CI 0.006, 0.115] nmol/l) (p = 0.03), when corrected for baseline imbalances in HbA(1c) levels, the C-peptide levels in the teplizumab-treated group were 17.7% higher (0.44 vs 0.378; difference, 0.049 [95% CI 0, 0.108] nmol/l, p = 0.09). A greater proportion of placebo-treated participants lost detectable C-peptide responses at 12 months (p = 0.03). The teplizumab group required less exogenous insulin (p < 0.001) but treatment differences in HbA(1c) levels were not observed. Teplizumab was well tolerated. A subgroup analysis showed that treatment benefits were larger in younger individuals and those with HbA(1c) <6.5% at entry. Clinical responders to teplizumab had an increase in circulating CD8 central memory cells 2 months after enrolment compared with non-responders.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: This study suggests that deterioration in insulin secretion may be affected by immune therapy with teplizumab after the new-onset period but the magnitude of the effect is less than during the new-onset period. Our studies identify characteristics of patients most likely to respond to this immune therapy.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00378508
This work was supported by grants 2007-502, 2007-1059 and 2006-351 from the JDRF and grants R01 DK057846, P30 DK20495, UL1 RR024139, UL1RR025780, UL1 RR024131 and UL1 RR024134 from the NIH.
目的/假设:1 型糖尿病是由新发病后的数年慢性自身免疫过程引起的。我们检测了在新发病后阶段使用 teplizumab(一种不结合 Fc 受体的抗 CD3 单克隆抗体)治疗是否会影响 1 型糖尿病患者 C 肽产生的下降。
在一项随机安慰剂对照试验中,我们在美国的四个学术中心使用 teplizumab 或安慰剂治疗了 58 名新发病的 1 型糖尿病患者 4-12 个月。中央随机化中心使用计算机生成的表格分配治疗。研究者、患者和护理人员对分组分配均不知情。主要结局是比较两组患者在 1 年后混合餐 C 肽反应。我们探索了治疗效果在患者亚组中的变化。
34 名和 29 名受试者分别被随机分配到药物和安慰剂治疗组,分别有 31 名和 27 名患者接受了分析。尽管主要结局分析显示,teplizumab 治疗组的 C 肽反应高出 21.7%(0.45 比 0.371;差值,0.059 [95%CI 0.006,0.115] nmol/L)(p=0.03),但校正基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))水平的不平衡后,teplizumab 治疗组的 C 肽水平高出 17.7%(0.44 比 0.378;差值,0.049 [95%CI 0,0.108] nmol/L,p=0.09)。12 个月时,更多的安慰剂治疗组患者失去了可检测的 C 肽反应(p=0.03)。teplizumab 组需要的外源性胰岛素更少(p<0.001),但 HbA(1c) 水平的治疗差异未观察到。teplizumab 耐受性良好。亚组分析显示,在年轻患者和基线 HbA(1c)<6.5%的患者中,治疗效果更大。与无反应者相比,对 teplizumab 有临床反应者在入组后 2 个月时循环 CD8 中央记忆细胞增加。
结论/解释:这项研究表明,在新发病后阶段使用 teplizumab 进行免疫治疗可能会影响胰岛素分泌的恶化,但效果幅度小于新发病阶段。我们的研究确定了最有可能对这种免疫治疗有反应的患者特征。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00378508
这项工作得到了 JDRF 的 2007-502、2007-1059 和 2006-351 以及 NIH 的 R01 DK057846、P30 DK20495、UL1 RR024139、UL1 RR025780、UL1 RR024131 和 UL1 RR024134 资助。