Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Oct;18(7):413-8. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2012.120501. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
We examined the validity and reliability of a physiotherapy examination of the elbow, using telerehabilitation. The patho-anatomical diagnoses, systems diagnosis and physical examination findings of face-to-face physiotherapy examinations were compared with telerehabilitation examinations. Ten participants attended a single session, during which they were interviewed, a face-to-face physical examination was performed and a remote physical examination was conducted, guided by an examiner at a different location via a telerehabilitation system. Conventional face-to-face physiotherapy physical examination test results, diagnoses and systems diagnoses were compared to those produced by an examiner using the telerehabiliation system. There was substantial agreement for systems diagnosis (73%; P = 0.013) for validity and almost perfect agreement for intra-rater reliability (90%; P = 0.001). The inter-rater reliability had a weaker and non-significant agreement (64%; P = 0.11). Physical examination data demonstrated >68% agreement across all three datasets, between the examination methods. Performing a telerehabilitation physical examination to determine a musculoskeletal diagnosis of the elbow joint complex is both valid and reliable.
我们使用远程康复检查来检验肘部物理疗法检查的有效性和可靠性。将面对面物理疗法检查的病理解剖学诊断、系统诊断和体检结果与远程康复检查进行了比较。十位参与者参加了一次会议,在此期间,他们接受了访谈,进行了面对面的体检,并在远程康复系统的指导下由位于不同地点的检查者进行了远程体检。将传统的面对面物理疗法体检结果、诊断和系统诊断与使用远程康复系统的检查者进行了比较。在有效性方面,系统诊断的一致性很高(73%;P = 0.013),内部一致性几乎完美(90%;P = 0.001)。在观察者间可靠性方面,一致性较弱且不显著(64%;P = 0.11)。体检数据显示,在所有三种检查方法之间,在所有数据集中,体检数据的一致性都超过了 68%。使用远程康复检查来确定肘部关节复合体的肌肉骨骼诊断是有效和可靠的。