• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用等值文本时中年级阅读者口语阅读流畅性中位数和平均数分数的信度与效度

Reliability and Validity of Oral Reading Fluency Median and Mean Scores among Middle Grade Readers When Using Equated Texts.

作者信息

Barth Amy E, Stuebing Karla K, Fletcher Jack M, Cirino Paul T, Romain Melissa, Francis David, Vaughn Sharon

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation and Statistics, and the Texas Center for Learning Disabilities, University of Houston.

出版信息

Read Psychol. 2012;33(1-2):133-161. doi: 10.1080/02702711.2012.631863. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1080/02702711.2012.631863
PMID:23087532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3472650/
Abstract

We evaluated the reliability and validity of two oral reading fluency scores for one-minute equated passages: median score and mean score. These scores were calculated from measures of reading fluency administered up to five times over the school year to students in grades 6-8 (n = 1,317). Both scores were highly reliable with strong convergent validity for adequately developing and struggling middle grade readers. These results support the use of either the median or mean score for oral reading fluency assessments for middle grade readers.

摘要

我们评估了一分钟等值段落的两种口语阅读流畅性分数的可靠性和有效性

中位数分数和平均数分数。这些分数是根据一学年内对6至8年级学生(n = 1,317)进行多达五次的阅读流畅性测量计算得出的。对于阅读能力充分发展的和学习困难的初中年级读者而言,这两种分数都具有高度可靠性和很强的收敛效度。这些结果支持在初中年级读者的口语阅读流畅性评估中使用中位数分数或平均数分数。

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of Oral Reading Fluency Median and Mean Scores among Middle Grade Readers When Using Equated Texts.使用等值文本时中年级阅读者口语阅读流畅性中位数和平均数分数的信度与效度
Read Psychol. 2012;33(1-2):133-161. doi: 10.1080/02702711.2012.631863. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
2
Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures.通过一分钟流畅性测试来识别阅读困难的读者或有阅读困难风险的人。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2021 Mar 20;34(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z.
3
The Effect of Reading Duration on the Reliability and Validity of Middle School Students' ORF Performance.阅读时长对中学生口语阅读流利度表现的信度和效度的影响
Assess Eff Interv. 2014 Dec;40(1):53-64. doi: 10.1177/1534508414545643.
4
The Effects of Student and Text Characteristics on the Oral Reading Fluency of Middle-Grade Students.学生及文本特征对中年级学生口语阅读流畅性的影响
J Educ Psychol. 2014 Feb;106(1):162-180. doi: 10.1037/a0033826.
5
Assessing oral reading fluency within and across grade levels: Development of equated test forms.评估不同年级内部和之间的口语阅读流畅性:等值测试形式的开发。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Dec;54(6):3043-3054. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01806-7. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
The utility and accuracy of oral reading fluency score types in predicting reading comprehension.朗读流畅性评分类型在预测阅读理解中的效用和准确性。
J Sch Psychol. 2011 Feb;49(1):107-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
7
Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers.初中阅读困难学生的阅读技能组成部分及缺陷
Read Writ. 2013 Aug;26(7):1059-1086. doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9406-3.
8
Psychometric Properties of Maze Tasks in Middle School Students.中学生迷宫任务的心理测量特性
Assess Eff Interv. 2012 Jun;37(3):131-146. doi: 10.1177/1534508411413913. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
9
Extending the Simple View of Reading to Account for Variation Within Readers and Across Texts: The Complete View of Reading (CVR).将阅读的简单观点扩展以解释读者内部和文本之间的差异:阅读的完整观点(CVR)。
Remedial Spec Educ. 2018 Sep;39(5):274-288. doi: 10.1177/0741932518772904. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
10
The Relations Among Oral and Silent Reading Fluency and Comprehension in Middle School: Implications for Identification and Instruction of Students With Reading Difficulties.中学阶段口语阅读流利度、默读流利度与阅读理解之间的关系:对阅读困难学生的识别与教学的启示
Sci Stud Read. 2011 Jan 13;15(2):109-135. doi: 10.1080/10888431003623546.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Predictive Validity of Oral Reading Fluency Slope in Upper Elementary Grades Using Quantile Regression.使用分位数回归检验小学高年级口语阅读流利度斜率的预测效度。
J Learn Disabil. 2018 Nov/Dec;51(6):565-577. doi: 10.1177/0022219417719887. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
2
Advanced (Measurement) Applications of Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading.基于课程的阅读测量的高级(测量)应用
Assess Eff Interv. 2013 Mar;38(2):71-75. doi: 10.1177/1534508412461434.
3
Why Intensive Interventions Matter: Longitudinal Studies of Adolescents With Reading Disabilities and Poor Reading Comprehension.为何强化干预至关重要:对有阅读障碍和阅读理解能力差的青少年的纵向研究
Learn Disabil Q. 2014 Nov 1;37(4):218-229. doi: 10.1177/0731948714528806.
4
REMEDIATING READING DIFFICULTIES IN A RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION MODEL WITH SECONDARY STUDENTS.在针对中学生的干预反应模型中纠正阅读困难
Psychol Sch. 2012 Mar 1;49(3):273-284. doi: 10.1002/pits.21593. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
5
Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties.中学阅读困难学生的干预反应。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):244-56. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442157. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Word Identification Fluency to Monitor First-Grade Reading Development.运用单词识别流畅性来监测一年级阅读发展情况。
Except Child. 2012 Jan;78(2):201-220. doi: 10.1177/001440291207800204.
2
Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: a meta-analysis of the correlational evidence.基于课程的口语阅读测量作为阅读成绩的指标:相关性证据的元分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2009 Dec;47(6):427-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
3
Form effects on the estimation of students' oral reading fluency using DIBELS.使用动态指标基本早期读写技能评估系统(DIBELS)时,形式对学生口语阅读流畅性评估的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2008 Jun;46(3):315-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
4
Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: operationalizing unexpected underachievement.识别学习障碍的替代方法的有效性:将意外学业不良操作化。
J Learn Disabil. 2005 Nov-Dec;38(6):545-52. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380061101.
5
Identifying valid measures of reading.识别有效的阅读测量方法。
Except Child. 1982 Sep;49(1):36-45.
6
Effects of systematic formative evaluation: a meta-analysis.系统性形成性评价的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Except Child. 1986 Nov;53(3):199-208. doi: 10.1177/001440298605300301.