Department of Counseling, Developmental, and Educational Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA.
J Couns Psychol. 2012 Oct;59(4):591-603. doi: 10.1037/a0030130.
This study drew upon the knowledge base of member practitioners of the American Psychological Association (APA) to develop a taxonomy of helpful and harmful practices for treatment with boys and men. Four hundred seventy-five APA-member practitioners solicited from practice-related divisions provided responses to 4 open-ended questions about helpful and harmful practices in working with boys and men. Ten themes emerged from qualitative analyses. Beneficial and sensitive practices included addressing gender socialization and gender-sensitive issues as they apply to boys and men in psychological practice. Harmful practices included biased practices, stereotypes, and a lack of awareness and training around gender and diversity issues as they apply to boys and men. We discuss the specific themes that emerged from analysis of the responses, how these findings are situated within previous work examining helpful and harmful practices, limitations to the study, suggestions for research, and implications for training psychologists.
本研究借鉴了美国心理协会(APA)成员从业者的知识基础,为男孩和男性的治疗制定了有益和有害实践的分类法。从与实践相关的部门中征集到的 475 名 APA 成员从业者对有关与男孩和男性一起工作中的有益和有害实践的 4 个开放式问题做出了回应。从定性分析中出现了 10 个主题。有益和敏感的实践包括在心理实践中解决性别社会化和与男孩和男性相关的性别敏感问题。有害的实践包括有偏见的实践、刻板印象,以及对与男孩和男性相关的性别和多样性问题缺乏意识和培训。我们讨论了从对回应的分析中出现的具体主题,这些发现如何在以前研究有益和有害实践的工作中定位,研究的局限性,对研究的建议,以及对培训心理学家的影响。