Department of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
J Chem Ecol. 2012 Oct;38(10):1264-75. doi: 10.1007/s10886-012-0202-y. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
Using herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) to attract specific natural enemies in the field has proven challenging, partly because of a poor understanding of: (i) which compound(s) to manipulate to attract specific taxa, and (ii) the ecological conditions over which HIPVs are effective. To address these issues, we quantified the response of a complex arthropod community to three common HIPVs (methyl salicylate, cis-3-hexen-1-ol, and phenylethyl alcohol) as individual compounds and equal part blends in corn and soybean fields. Of 119 arthropod taxa surveyed, we found significant responses by four species in corn fields (2 parasitoids, 1 herbivore, and 1 detritivore) and 16 in soybean fields (8 parasitoids, 3 predators, 4 herbivores, and 1 detritivore), with both attractive and repellent effects of the HIPVs observed. For example, tachinid flies were highly attracted to cis-3-hexen-1-ol (ca. 3-fold increase), but repelled by methyl salicylate (ca. 60 % decrease). Surprisingly, we found very few cases in which HIPVs acted synergistically; only two arthropod groups (ichneumonid wasps and phorid flies) were more attracted by a blend of the HIPVs than by the individual compounds composing the blend. Crop type, however, had a strong impact on the strength of arthropod responses to HIPVs. A few arthropod species were broadly affected across both crops (i.e., the herbivore Halticus bractatus was repelled by most of our treatments, regardless of crop background), but overall more arthropod groups responded to HIPVs released in soybean fields compared with corn. This was true despite the fact that taxa responding to HIPVs were present and abundant in both systems, suggesting that crop-based outcomes were likely driven by the plant matrix rather than mere differences in taxonomic composition of the arthropod community in corn vs. soybean fields. As a whole, these results suggest that: (i) repellent effects of HIPVs on natural enemies of herbivorous insects can be observed as frequently as attractive effects; (ii) odor blends may be no more effective than single-compound lures for some taxa; and (iii) crop background alters the magnitude of attraction to HIPVs, depending on the species being targeted.
利用草食性昆虫诱导的植物挥发物(HIPVs)在野外吸引特定的天敌已被证明具有挑战性,部分原因是对以下两个方面的理解不足:(i)操纵哪种(些)化合物来吸引特定的类群,以及(ii)HIPVs 有效的生态条件。为了解决这些问题,我们量化了复杂的节肢动物群落对三种常见的 HIPVs(水杨酸甲酯、顺-3-己烯-1-醇和苯乙醇)作为单一化合物和等份混合物在玉米和大豆田中的反应。在调查的 119 种节肢动物中,我们发现有 4 种在玉米田中(2 种寄生蜂、1 种草食性昆虫和 1 种食腐动物)和 16 种在大豆田中(8 种寄生蜂、3 种捕食者、4 种草食性昆虫和 1 种食腐动物)对 HIPVs 有显著的反应,观察到 HIPVs 既有吸引作用又有排斥作用。例如,潜蝇茧蜂对顺-3-己烯-1-醇高度吸引(约增加 3 倍),但对水杨酸甲酯排斥(约减少 60%)。令人惊讶的是,我们发现很少有协同作用的情况;只有两类节肢动物(姬蜂和褶翅蝇)对 HIPVs 的混合物比对组成混合物的单一化合物更有吸引力。然而,作物类型对节肢动物对 HIPVs 的反应强度有很强的影响。少数几种节肢动物在两种作物中都受到广泛影响(即,草食性昆虫 Halticus bractatus 被我们的大多数处理方法所排斥,而不管作物背景如何),但与玉米田相比,大豆田中释放的 HIPVs 更能引起更多的节肢动物群体的反应。尽管在这两个系统中都存在和大量存在对 HIPVs 有反应的节肢动物,但总的来说,这表明作物产生的结果很可能是由植物基质驱动的,而不是仅仅由玉米与大豆田的节肢动物群落的分类组成差异造成的。总的来说,这些结果表明:(i)HIPVs 对草食性昆虫天敌的排斥作用与吸引作用一样常见;(ii)气味混合物可能并不比单一化合物诱饵对某些类群更有效;(iii)作物背景根据目标物种的不同,会改变对 HIPVs 的吸引力大小。