Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy.
Dep. of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Box 102, 230 53, Alnarp, Sweden.
J Chem Ecol. 2021 Jul;47(7):653-663. doi: 10.1007/s10886-021-01288-5. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
Upon damage by herbivores, plants release herbivory-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs). To find their prey, the pest's natural enemies need to be fine-tuned to the composition of these volatiles. Whereas standard methods can be used in the identification and quantitation of HIPVs, more recently introduced techniques such as PTR-ToF-MS provide temporal patterns of the volatile release and detect additional compounds. In this study, we compared the volatile profile of apple trees infested with two aphid species, the green apple aphid Aphis pomi, and the rosy apple aphid Dysaphis plantaginea, by CLSA-GC-MS complemented by PTR-ToF-MS. Compounds commonly released in conjunction with both species include nonanal, decanal, methyl salicylate, geranyl acetone, (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, (Z)-3-hexenyl butanoate, (Z)-3-hexenyl 2-methyl-butanoate, (E)-β-caryophyllene, β-bourbonene and (Z)-3-hexenyl benzoate. In addition, benzaldehyde and (E)-β-farnesene were exclusively associated with A. pomi, whereas linalool, (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene were exclusively associated with D. plantaginea. PTR-ToF-MS additionally detected acetic acid (AA) and 2-phenylethanol (PET) in the blends of both trees attacked by aphid species. In the wind tunnel, the aphid predator, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens), responded strongly to a blend of AA and PET, much stronger than to AA or PET alone. The addition of common and species-specific HIPVs did not increase the response to the binary blend of AA and PET. In our setup, two host-associated volatiles AA + PET appeared sufficient in the attraction of C. carnea. Our results also show the importance of combining complementary methods to decipher the odor profile associated with plants under pest attack and identify behaviourally active components for predators.
植物受到食草动物侵害后会释放出取食诱导的挥发物(HIPVs)。害虫的天敌需要对这些挥发物的成分进行微调,才能找到它们的猎物。虽然可以使用标准方法来鉴定和定量 HIPVs,但最近引入的技术,如 PTR-ToF-MS,可以提供挥发物释放的时间模式,并检测到额外的化合物。在这项研究中,我们通过 CLSA-GC-MS 结合 PTR-ToF-MS 比较了两种蚜虫(绿色苹果蚜虫 Aphis pomi 和蔷薇苹果蚜虫 Dysaphis plantaginea)侵害的苹果树的挥发物特征。两种物种共同释放的化合物包括壬醛、癸醛、水杨酸甲酯、香叶基丙酮、(Z)-3-己烯基乙酸酯、(Z)-3-己烯基丁酸酯、(Z)-3-己烯基 2-甲基丁酸酯、(E)-β-石竹烯、β-波旁烯和(Z)-3-己烯基苯甲酸酯。此外,苯甲醛和(E)-β-法呢烯仅与 A. pomi 相关,而芳樟醇和(E)-4,8-二甲基-1,3,7-壬三烯仅与 D. plantaginea 相关。PTR-ToF-MS 还在两种被蚜虫攻击的树木混合物中检测到了乙酸(AA)和 2-苯乙醇(PET)。在风洞中,蚜虫捕食者草蛉(Chrysoperla carnea)(斯蒂芬斯)对 AA 和 PET 的混合物反应强烈,比单独使用 AA 或 PET 强烈得多。添加常见和物种特异性的 HIPVs 并没有增加对 AA 和 PET 二元混合物的反应。在我们的设置中,两种与宿主相关的挥发物 AA + PET 在吸引 C. carnea 方面似乎已经足够了。我们的研究结果还表明,结合互补方法来破译与受虫害攻击的植物相关的气味特征并确定捕食者的行为活性成分非常重要。