Department of Primary and Community Care Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;18(11):1717-22. doi: 10.3201/eid1811.111804.
Outbreaks in which most or all persons were exposed to the same suspected source of infection, so-called universal exposure, are common. They represent a challenge for public health specialists because conducting analytical studies in such investigations is complicated by the absence of a nonexposed group. We describe different strategies that can support investigations of outbreaks with universal exposure. The value of descriptive epidemiology, extensive environmental investigation, and the hypothesis-generation phase cannot be overemphasized. An exposure that seems universal may in fact not be universal when additional aspects of the exposure are taken into account. Each exposure has unique characteristics that may not be captured when investigators rely on the tools readily at hand, such as standard questionnaires. We therefore encourage field epidemiologists to be creative and consider the use of alternative data sources or original techniques in their investigations of outbreaks with universal exposure.
大多数或所有接触同一疑似感染源的人都爆发了感染,这种情况被称为普遍暴露,很常见。由于此类调查中缺乏未暴露人群,这给公共卫生专家带来了挑战。我们描述了不同的策略,这些策略可以支持对普遍暴露的疫情爆发进行调查。描述性流行病学、广泛的环境调查和假设生成阶段的价值怎么强调都不为过。当考虑到暴露的其他方面时,看似普遍的暴露实际上可能并不普遍。每个暴露都有其独特的特征,如果调查人员仅依赖现成的工具(如标准问卷),可能无法捕捉到这些特征。因此,我们鼓励现场流行病学家发挥创造力,并考虑在调查普遍暴露的疫情爆发时使用替代数据源或原始技术。