Suppr超能文献

研究实验室中的领导力、管理与团队实践:两项新测量方法的开发与验证

Leadership, management, and team practices in research labs: Development and validation of two new measures.

作者信息

Antes Alison L, English Tammy, Solomon Erin D, Wroblewski Matthew, McIntosh Tristan, Stenmark Cheryl K, DuBois James M

机构信息

Bioethics Research Center, Department of Medicine, Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Account Res. 2024 Oct 22:1-28. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2412772.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective leadership and management practices contribute to responsible, high-quality research and the well-being of team members. We describe the development and initial validation of a measure assessing principal investigators' leadership and management practices and a measure of research team practices.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional survey design, 570 postdoctoral researchers funded by the National Institutes of Health reported on the perceived behaviors of their principal investigator (PI) and the research team. The PI leadership and management items factored into two dimensions: fostering relationships and directing research.

RESULTS

Correlations of these new scales with existing, validated measures of ethical leadership and general leader behavior provided evidence of convergent validity. Providing evidence for criterion-related validity, scores on the new measures predicted lab climate for research ethics, self-reported productivity, and job satisfaction. Research team practices provided additional predictive value beyond leadership and management behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides construct validity evidence for the new Leadership and Management in Science (LAMPS) Measure and the Research Team Practices (RTP) Measure. Qualitative responses to an open-ended item reinforced the importance of relationships and directive supervision for a positive environment. These measures can be useful tools for future research or may be useful for PIs seeking feedback about their practices.

摘要

背景

有效的领导和管理实践有助于开展负责任的高质量研究,并促进团队成员的福祉。我们描述了一项评估主要研究者领导和管理实践的量表以及一项研究团队实践量表的开发和初步验证。

方法

采用横断面调查设计,570名由美国国立卫生研究院资助的博士后研究人员报告了他们对主要研究者(PI)和研究团队行为的感知。PI领导和管理项目分为两个维度:建立关系和指导研究。

结果

这些新量表与现有的、经过验证的道德领导和一般领导行为量表之间的相关性提供了聚合效度的证据。为与标准相关的效度提供证据的是,新量表的得分预测了研究伦理的实验室氛围、自我报告的生产力和工作满意度。研究团队实践在领导和管理行为之外提供了额外的预测价值。

结论

本研究为新的科学领导与管理(LAMPS)量表和研究团队实践(RTP)量表提供了结构效度证据。对一个开放式问题的定性回答强化了关系和指导性监督对营造积极环境的重要性。这些量表可能是未来研究的有用工具,也可能对寻求有关其实践反馈的PI有用。

相似文献

3
Development of a Brief, Positively Framed Care Team Experience Measure.一种简短的、积极框架的护理团队体验测量方法的开发。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):680-689. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003336. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
10
[Charisma and leadership: new challenges for psychiatry].[魅力与领导力:精神病学面临的新挑战]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

9
Ten Simple Rules for a successful remote postdoc.成功远程博士后的 10 个简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 May 7;16(5):e1007809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007809. eCollection 2020 May.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验