The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0535, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan;109(2):591-602. doi: 10.1152/jn.00447.2012. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
We developed wavelet-based functional ANOVA (wfANOVA) as a novel approach for comparing neurophysiological signals that are functions of time. Temporal resolution is often sacrificed by analyzing such data in large time bins, increasing statistical power by reducing the number of comparisons. We performed ANOVA in the wavelet domain because differences between curves tend to be represented by a few temporally localized wavelets, which we transformed back to the time domain for visualization. We compared wfANOVA and ANOVA performed in the time domain (tANOVA) on both experimental electromyographic (EMG) signals from responses to perturbation during standing balance across changes in peak perturbation acceleration (3 levels) and velocity (4 levels) and on simulated data with known contrasts. In experimental EMG data, wfANOVA revealed the continuous shape and magnitude of significant differences over time without a priori selection of time bins. However, tANOVA revealed only the largest differences at discontinuous time points, resulting in features with later onsets and shorter durations than those identified using wfANOVA (P < 0.02). Furthermore, wfANOVA required significantly fewer (~1/4;×; P < 0.015) significant F tests than tANOVA, resulting in post hoc tests with increased power. In simulated EMG data, wfANOVA identified known contrast curves with a high level of precision (r(2) = 0.94 ± 0.08) and performed better than tANOVA across noise levels (P < <0.01). Therefore, wfANOVA may be useful for revealing differences in the shape and magnitude of neurophysiological signals (e.g., EMG, firing rates) across multiple conditions with both high temporal resolution and high statistical power.
我们开发了基于小波的功能方差分析 (wfANOVA),作为一种比较时间函数神经生理信号的新方法。通过在大时间窗口中分析这些数据,通常会牺牲时间分辨率,通过减少比较次数来提高统计功效。我们在小波域中进行方差分析,因为曲线之间的差异往往由几个时间局部化的小波表示,我们将这些小波转换回时间域进行可视化。我们比较了 wfANOVA 和在时间域 (tANOVA) 中进行的方差分析,这两种方法都应用于站立平衡期间对扰动的反应的实验肌电图 (EMG) 信号,这些信号在峰值扰动加速度 (3 个水平) 和速度 (4 个水平) 变化时进行分析,以及在具有已知对比的模拟数据上进行分析。在实验 EMG 数据中,wfANOVA 揭示了显著差异的连续形状和幅度,而无需事先选择时间窗口。然而,tANOVA 仅在不连续的时间点上揭示最大差异,导致与使用 wfANOVA 识别的特征相比,具有较晚的起始和较短的持续时间 (P < 0.02)。此外,wfANOVA 所需的显著 F 检验数量显著减少 (~1/4;×; P < 0.015),与 tANOVA 相比,事后检验的功效更高。在模拟 EMG 数据中,wfANOVA 以高精度 (r(2) = 0.94 ± 0.08) 识别已知对比曲线,在噪声水平下表现优于 tANOVA (P < <0.01)。因此,wfANOVA 可能有助于揭示多个条件下神经生理信号 (例如,EMG、放电率) 的形状和幅度的差异,具有高时间分辨率和高统计功效。