Philadelphia VA Medical Center and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 20;60(21):2170-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.054. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
This study sought to assess the relationship between central pressure profiles and cardiovascular events (CVEs) in a large community-based sample.
Experimental and physiologic data mechanistically implicate wave reflections in the pathogenesis of left ventricular failure and cardiovascular disease, but their association with these outcomes in the general population is unclear.
Aortic pressure waveforms were derived from a generalized transfer function applied to the radial pressure waveform recorded noninvasively from 5,960 participants in the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. The central pressure waveform was separated into forward and reflected waves using a physiologic flow waveform. Reflection magnitude (RM = [Reflected/Forward wave amplitude] × 100), augmentation index ([Second/First systolic peak] × 100) and pulse pressure amplification ([Radial/aortic pulse pressure] × 100) were assessed as predictors of CVEs and congestive heart failure (CHF) during a median follow-up of 7.61 years.
After adjustment for established risk factors, aortic AIx independently predicted hard CVEs (hazard ratio [HR] per 10% increase: 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.14; p = 0.016), whereas PPA independently predicted all CVEs (HR per 10% increase: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.96; p = 0.012). RM was independently predictive of all CVEs (HR per 10% increase: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.67; p = 0.009) and hard CVEs (HR per 10% increase: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.90; p = 0.006) and was strongly predictive of new-onset CHF (HR per 10% increase: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.79 to 4.04; p < 0.0001), comparing favorably to other risk factors for CHF as per various measures of model performance, reclassification, and discrimination. In a fully adjusted model, compared to nonhypertensive subjects with low RM, the HRs (95% CI) for hypertensive subjects with low RM, nonhypertensive subjects with high RM, and hypertensive subjects with high RM were 1.81 (0.85 to 3.86), 2.16 (1.07 to 5.01), and 3.98 (1.96 to 8.05), respectively.
Arterial wave reflections represent a novel strong risk factor for CHF in the general population.
本研究旨在评估大动脉压力特征与心血管事件(CVE)之间的关系,研究对象为一个大型社区人群样本。
实验和生理学数据从机制上提示,波反射与左心室衰竭和心血管疾病的发病机制有关,但它们与普通人群中这些结果的关系尚不清楚。
应用广义传递函数从 5960 名动脉粥样硬化多民族研究参与者的桡动脉压力波形中推导出主动脉压力波形。使用生理流量波形将中央压力波形分为正向波和反射波。反射幅度(RM=[反射波/正向波幅度]×100)、增强指数(AIx=[第二/第一收缩峰]×100)和脉搏压力放大率(PPA=[桡动脉/主动脉脉搏压力]×100)作为 CVEs 和充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的预测因子,在中位随访 7.61 年后进行评估。
在校正了既定风险因素后,主动脉 AIx 独立预测硬 CVEs(每增加 10%的风险比[HR]:1.08;95%置信区间[CI]:1.01 至 1.14;p=0.016),而 PPA 独立预测所有 CVEs(每增加 10%的 HR:0.82;95%CI:0.70 至 0.96;p=0.012)。RM 独立预测所有 CVEs(每增加 10%的 HR:1.34;95%CI:1.08 至 1.67;p=0.009)和硬 CVEs(每增加 10%的 HR:1.46;95%CI:1.12 至 1.90;p=0.006),并强烈预测新发 CHF(每增加 10%的 HR:2.69;95%CI:1.79 至 4.04;p<0.0001),在各种模型性能、重新分类和判别措施方面,与心力衰竭的其他危险因素相比具有优势。在完全调整的模型中,与 RM 值低的非高血压患者相比,RM 值低的高血压患者、RM 值高的非高血压患者和 RM 值高的高血压患者的 HR(95%CI)分别为 1.81(0.85 至 3.86)、2.16(1.07 至 5.01)和 3.98(1.96 至 8.05)。
动脉波反射是普通人群心力衰竭的一个新的强危险因素。