Departments of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8896, USA.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 May 14;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-16-33.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been validated for the noninvasive assessment of total arterial compliance and aortic stiffness, but their associations with cardiovascular outcomes is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations of CMR measures of total arterial compliance and two CMR measures of aortic stiffness with respect to future cardiovascular events.
The study consisted of 2122 Dallas Heart Study participants without cardiovascular disease who underwent CMR at 1.5 Tesla. Aortic stiffness was measured by CMR-derived ascending aortic distensibility and aortic arch pulse wave velocity. Total arterial compliance was calculated by dividing left ventricular stroke volume by pulse pressure. Participants were monitored for cardiovascular death, non-fatal cardiac events, and non-fatal extra-cardiac vascular events over 7.8 ± 1.5 years. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess for associations between CMR measures and cardiovascular events.
Age, systolic blood pressure, and resting heart rate were independently associated with changes in ascending aortic distensibility, arch pulse wave velocity, and total arterial compliance (all p < .0001). A total of 153 participants (6.9%) experienced a cardiovascular event. After adjusting for traditional risk factors, total arterial compliance was modestly associated with increased risk for composite events (HR 1.07 per 1SD, p = 0.03) while the association between ascending aortic distensibility and composite events trended towards significance (HR 1.18 per 1SD, p = 0.08). Total arterial compliance and aortic distensibility were independently associated with nonfatal cardiac events (HR 1.11 per 1SD, p = 0.001 and HR 1.45 per 1SD, p = 0.0005, respectively), but not with cardiovascular death or nonfatal extra-cardiac vascular events. Arch pulse wave velocity was independently associated with nonfatal extra-cardiac vascular events (HR 1.18 per 1SD, p = 0.04) but not with cardiovascular death or nonfatal cardiac events.
In a multiethnic population free of cardiovascular disease, CMR measures of arterial stiffness are associated with future cardiovascular events. Total arterial compliance and aortic distensibility may be stronger predictors of nonfatal cardiac events, while pulse wave velocity may be a stronger predictor of nonfatal extra-cardiac vascular events.
心血管磁共振(CMR)已被验证可用于无创评估总动脉顺应性和主动脉僵硬度,但它们与心血管结局的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估 CMR 总动脉顺应性测量值和两种 CMR 主动脉僵硬度测量值与未来心血管事件的关系。
该研究纳入了 2122 名无心血管疾病的达拉斯心脏研究参与者,他们在 1.5T 磁共振仪上进行了 CMR 检查。通过 CMR 衍生的升主动脉可扩张性和主动脉弓脉搏波速度来测量主动脉僵硬度。总动脉顺应性通过左心室每搏量除以脉压计算得出。参与者在 7.8±1.5 年内监测心血管死亡、非致死性心脏事件和非致死性心脏外血管事件。使用 Cox 比例风险回归评估 CMR 测量值与心血管事件之间的关系。
年龄、收缩压和静息心率与升主动脉可扩张性、弓脉搏波速度和总动脉顺应性的变化独立相关(均 P<.0001)。共有 153 名参与者(6.9%)发生心血管事件。在调整传统危险因素后,总动脉顺应性与复合事件的风险增加呈中度相关(每 1SD 增加 1.07,P=0.03),而升主动脉可扩张性与复合事件的相关性呈趋势性(每 1SD 增加 1.18,P=0.08)。总动脉顺应性和主动脉可扩张性与非致死性心脏事件独立相关(每 1SD 分别增加 1.11,P=0.001 和 1.45,P=0.0005),但与心血管死亡或非致死性心脏外血管事件无关。弓脉搏波速度与非致死性心脏外血管事件独立相关(每 1SD 增加 1.18,P=0.04),但与心血管死亡或非致死性心脏事件无关。
在一个无心血管疾病的多民族人群中,CMR 动脉僵硬度测量值与未来心血管事件相关。总动脉顺应性和主动脉可扩张性可能是更能预测非致死性心脏事件的指标,而脉搏波速度可能是更能预测非致死性心脏外血管事件的指标。