Suppr超能文献

胺碘酮和西沙必利对模拟人心室电生理和心电图的影响。

Impact of amiodarone and cisapride on simulated human ventricular electrophysiology and electrocardiograms.

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Kaiserstrasse 12, Karlsruhe, Germany.

出版信息

Europace. 2012 Nov;14 Suppl 5:v90-v96. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus281.

Abstract

AIMS

Amiodarone and cisapride are both known to prolong the QT interval, yet the two drugs have different effects on arrhythmia. Cisapride can cause torsades de pointes while amiodarone is found to be anti-arrhythmic. A computational model was used to investigate the action of these two drugs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a biophysically detailed model, the ion current conductivities affected by both drugs were reduced in order to simulate the pharmacological effects in healthy and ischaemic cells. Furthermore, restitution curves of the action potential duration (APD), effective refractory period, conduction velocity, wavelength, and the vulnerable window were determined in a one-dimensional (1D) tissue strand. Moreover, cardiac excitation propagation was computed in a 3D model of healthy ventricles. The corresponding body surface potentials were calculated and standard 12-lead electrocardiograms were derived. Both cisapride and amiodarone caused a prolongation of the QT interval and the refractory period. However, cisapride did not significantly alter the conduction-related properties, such as e.g. the wavelength or vulnerable window, whereas amiodarone had a larger impact on them. It slightly flattened the APD restitution slope and furthermore reduced the conduction velocity and wavelength.

CONCLUSION

Both drugs show similar prolongation of the QT interval, although they present different electrophysiological properties in the single-cell as well as in tissue simulations of cardiac excitation propagation. These computer simulations help to better understand the underlying mechanisms responsible for the initiation or termination of arrhythmias caused by amiodarone and cisapride.

摘要

目的

胺碘酮和西沙必利均已知可延长 QT 间期,但这两种药物对心律失常的影响却不同。西沙必利可引起尖端扭转型室性心动过速,而胺碘酮则具有抗心律失常作用。本研究采用计算模型来研究这两种药物的作用。

方法和结果

在一个详细的生物物理模型中,为了模拟健康细胞和缺血细胞中的药理学作用,降低了受这两种药物影响的离子电流导率。此外,在一维(1D)组织条带中确定了动作电位时程(APD)、有效不应期、传导速度、波长和易损窗口的复极 restitution 曲线。此外,还在健康心室的 3D 模型中计算了心脏兴奋传播。计算了相应的体表电位并得出了标准 12 导联心电图。西沙必利和胺碘酮均导致 QT 间期和不应期延长。然而,西沙必利并没有显著改变与传导相关的特性,例如波长或易损窗口,而胺碘酮对这些特性的影响更大。它略微平坦了 APD restitution 斜率,并进一步降低了传导速度和波长。

结论

尽管这两种药物在单细胞和组织兴奋传播模拟中表现出不同的电生理特性,但它们都显示出 QT 间期的相似延长。这些计算机模拟有助于更好地理解胺碘酮和西沙必利引起心律失常的起始或终止的潜在机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验