Division of Theoretical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Nov 26;52(11):3013-21. doi: 10.1021/ci300349s. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
In this paper, I evaluate the usefulness of protein homology models in rigorous free-energy simulations to determine ligand affinities. Two templates were used to create models of the factor Xa protein and one template was used for dihydrofolate reductase from Plasmodium falciparum. Then, the relative free energies for several pairs of ligands were estimated using thermodynamic integration with the homology models as starting point of the simulation. These binding affinities were compared to affinities obtained when using published crystal structures as starting point of the simulations. Encouragingly, the differences between the affinities obtained when starting from either homology models or crystal structure were not statistical significant for a majority of the considered pairs of ligands. Differences between 1 and 2 kJ/mol were observed for the dihydrofolate reductase ligands and differences between 0 and 8 kJ/mol were observed for the factor Xa ligands. The largest difference for factor Xa was caused by an erroneous modeling of a loop region close to two of the ligands, and it was only observed when using one of the templates. Therefore, it is advisible to always use more than one template when creating homology models if they should be used in free-energy simulations.
在本文中,我评估了蛋白质同源模型在严格的自由能模拟中确定配体亲和力的有用性。使用了两个模板来创建因子 Xa 蛋白的模型,一个模板用于恶性疟原虫二氢叶酸还原酶。然后,使用热力学积分法从同源模型开始模拟,估计了几对配体的相对自由能。将这些结合亲和力与使用已发表的晶体结构作为模拟起点获得的亲和力进行了比较。令人鼓舞的是,对于大多数考虑的配体对,从同源模型或晶体结构开始获得的亲和力之间的差异在统计学上并不显著。二氢叶酸还原酶配体的差异在 1 和 2 kJ/mol 之间,因子 Xa 配体的差异在 0 和 8 kJ/mol 之间。因子 Xa 的最大差异是由于靠近两个配体的一个环区域的错误建模引起的,仅在使用其中一个模板时观察到。因此,如果要在自由能模拟中使用同源模型,建议始终使用多个模板。