• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在不确定条件下的非理性选择与大鼠纹状体 D2/3 受体结合降低有关。

Irrational choice under uncertainty correlates with lower striatal D(2/3) receptor binding in rats.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 31;32(44):15450-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0626-12.2012.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0626-12.2012
PMID:23115182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6621583/
Abstract

Individual differences in dopamine (DA) signaling, including low striatal D(2/3) receptors, may increase vulnerability to substance abuse, although whether this phenotype confers susceptibility to nonchemical addictions is unclear. The degree to which people use "irrational" cognitive heuristics when choosing under uncertainty can determine whether they find gambling addictive. Given that dopaminergic projections to the striatum signal reward expectancy and modulate decision-making, individual differences in DA signaling could influence the extent of such biases. To test this hypothesis, we used a novel task to model biased, risk-averse decision-making in rats. Animals chose between a "safe" lever, which guaranteed delivery of the wager, or an "uncertain" lever, which delivered either double the wager or nothing with 50:50 odds. The bet size varied from one to three sugar pellets. Although the amount at stake did not alter the options' utility, a subgroup of "wager-sensitive" rats increased their preference for the safe lever as the bet size increased, akin to risk aversion. In contrast, wager-insensitive rats slightly preferred the uncertain option consistently. Amphetamine increased choice of the uncertain option in wager-sensitive, but not in wager-insensitive rats, whereas a D(2/3) receptor antagonist decreased uncertain lever choice in wager-insensitive rats alone. Micro-PET and autoradiography using [(11)C]raclopride confirmed a strong correlation between high wager sensitivity and low striatal D(2/3) receptor density. These data suggest that the propensity for biased decision-making under uncertainty is influenced by striatal D(2/3) receptor expression, and provide novel support for the hypothesis that susceptibility to chemical and behavioral addictions may share a common neurobiological basis.

摘要

个体多巴胺(DA)信号传递的差异,包括纹状体 D2/3 受体水平较低,可能会增加对物质滥用的易感性,尽管这种表型是否会导致对非化学成瘾的易感性尚不清楚。人们在不确定的情况下选择时使用“不合理”认知启发式的程度可以决定他们是否会觉得赌博上瘾。鉴于多巴胺能投射到纹状体的信号传递奖励预期并调节决策,DA 信号传递的个体差异可能会影响这种偏见的程度。为了验证这一假设,我们使用一种新的任务在大鼠中模拟有偏差的、规避风险的决策。动物在“安全”杠杆和“不确定”杠杆之间进行选择,前者保证了赌注的兑现,后者则以 50:50 的概率获得双倍赌注或一无所有。赌注大小从一个到三个糖丸不等。尽管赌注的数量不会改变选项的效用,但一组“赌注敏感”的大鼠随着赌注大小的增加,会增加对安全杠杆的偏好,类似于风险规避。相比之下,“赌注不敏感”的大鼠则一直略微偏爱不确定的选择。安非他命增加了“赌注敏感”大鼠对不确定选择的选择,而不是“赌注不敏感”大鼠;而 D2/3 受体拮抗剂仅降低了“赌注不敏感”大鼠对不确定杠杆的选择。使用[(11)C]raclopride 的微 PET 和放射自显影证实,高赌注敏感性与纹状体 D2/3 受体密度之间存在很强的相关性。这些数据表明,在不确定情况下做出有偏差的决策的倾向受到纹状体 D2/3 受体表达的影响,并为化学和行为成瘾的易感性可能具有共同的神经生物学基础的假设提供了新的支持。

相似文献

1
Irrational choice under uncertainty correlates with lower striatal D(2/3) receptor binding in rats.在不确定条件下的非理性选择与大鼠纹状体 D2/3 受体结合降低有关。
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 31;32(44):15450-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0626-12.2012.
2
Dopaminergic modulation of risk-based decision making.基于风险的决策的多巴胺能调节。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Feb;34(3):681-97. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.121. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
3
Risky decision-making and ventral striatal dopamine responses to amphetamine: a positron emission tomography [(11)C]raclopride study in healthy adults.冒险决策与腹侧纹状体对苯丙胺的多巴胺反应:一项针对健康成年人的正电子发射断层扫描[(11)C]雷氯必利研究。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jun;113:26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
4
Amphetamine primes enhanced motivation toward uncertain choices in rats with genetic alcohol preference.安非他命增强了具有遗传酒精偏好的大鼠对不确定选择的动机。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 May;235(5):1361-1370. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4847-2. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
Dissociable contributions by prefrontal D1 and D2 receptors to risk-based decision making.前额叶 D1 和 D2 受体对基于风险的决策的可分离贡献。
J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 8;31(23):8625-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1020-11.2011.
6
Serotonergic and dopaminergic modulation of gambling behavior as assessed using a novel rat gambling task.使用新型大鼠赌博任务评估5-羟色胺能和多巴胺能对赌博行为的调节作用。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Sep;34(10):2329-43. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.62. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
7
Dopamine D3 Receptors Modulate the Ability of Win-Paired Cues to Increase Risky Choice in a Rat Gambling Task.多巴胺D3受体调节赢牌配对线索在大鼠赌博任务中增加风险选择的能力。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;36(3):785-94. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2225-15.2016.
8
Modulation of risk/reward decision making by dopaminergic transmission within the basolateral amygdala.基底外侧杏仁核内多巴胺能传递对风险/回报决策的调节作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Jan;233(1):121-36. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4094-8. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
9
GPR52 agonists attenuate ropinirole-induced preference for uncertain outcomes.GPR52 激动剂可减轻罗匹尼罗诱导的对不确定结果的偏好。
Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb;135(1):8-23. doi: 10.1037/bne0000391. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
10
Dopaminergic modulation of reward-guided decision making in alcohol-preferring AA rats.多巴胺能对嗜酒AA大鼠奖赏引导决策的调节作用。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 May 30;326:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuromodulation of Dopamine D2 Receptors Alters Orbitofrontal Neuronal Activity and Reduces Risk-Prone Behavior in Male Rats with Inflammatory Pain.多巴胺D2受体的神经调节改变了炎性疼痛雄性大鼠的眶额神经元活动并降低了易冒险行为。
Mol Neurobiol. 2025 Feb 22. doi: 10.1007/s12035-025-04781-0.
2
Methamphetamine increases risky choice in rats, but only when magnitude and probability of reinforcement are manipulated within a session.甲基苯丙胺会增加大鼠的冒险选择,但只有在一次试验中操纵强化的幅度和概率时才会如此。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024 Jun;239:173751. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173751. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
3
Thoughts from the forest floor: a review of cognition in the slime mould Physarum polycephalum.从森林地面的思考:对多头绒泡菌认知的综述。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Nov;26(6):1783-1797. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01782-1. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Seeking motivation and reward: Roles of dopamine, hippocampus, and supramammillo-septal pathway.寻求动机和奖励:多巴胺、海马体和穹窿-隔束通路的作用。
Prog Neurobiol. 2022 May;212:102252. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102252. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
5
Learning as filtering: Implications for spike-based plasticity.学习即滤波:对基于尖峰的可塑性的启示。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Feb 23;18(2):e1009721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009721. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
Advances in understanding meso-cortico-limbic-striatal systems mediating risky reward seeking.理解中脑边缘纹状体系统介导风险奖励寻求的进展。
J Neurochem. 2021 Jun;157(5):1547-1571. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15342. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
7
Irrational Responses to Risk Preference Questionnaires by Patients with Diabetes with or without Retinopathy and Comparison with Those without Diabetes.患有或不患有视网膜病变的糖尿病患者对风险偏好问卷的非理性反应以及与非糖尿病患者的比较。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Dec 14;13:4961-4971. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S283591. eCollection 2020.
8
Dissociable dopaminergic and pavlovian influences in goal-trackers and sign-trackers on a model of compulsive checking in OCD.在强迫症强迫检查模型中,目标追踪者和线索追踪者的多巴胺能和巴甫洛夫影响可分离。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Dec;237(12):3569-3581. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05636-3. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
Challenges and Opportunities in Animal Models of Gambling-like Behavior.赌博样行为动物模型中的挑战与机遇
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020 Feb;31:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.013. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
10
Understanding Addiction Using Animal Models.利用动物模型理解成瘾问题。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Nov 29;13:262. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00262. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision-making heuristics and biases across the life span.决策启发式和偏见在整个生命周期中的表现。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Oct;1235:57-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06208.x.
2
Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: a preliminary report.参加英国国家问题赌博诊所的病态赌徒的冲动和认知扭曲:初步报告。
Psychol Med. 2011 Dec;41(12):2625-35. doi: 10.1017/S003329171100095X. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
3
Dopaminergic modulation of the orbitofrontal cortex affects attention, motivation and impulsive responding in rats performing the five-choice serial reaction time task.多巴胺能调制眶额皮层影响大鼠在执行五选择连续反应时任务中的注意力、动机和冲动反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Jul 11;210(2):263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.02.044. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
4
Decision-making during gambling: an integration of cognitive and psychobiological approaches.赌博中的决策:认知和心理生物学方法的整合。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jan 27;365(1538):319-30. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0147.
5
Gambling related cognitions mediate the association between thinking style and problem gambling severity.赌博相关认知在思维方式与赌博问题严重程度之间起中介作用。
J Gambl Stud. 2010 Jun;26(2):257-67. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9164-6.
6
Cognitive influences on risk-seeking by rhesus macaques.恒河猴风险寻求行为的认知影响
Judgm Decis Mak. 2008 Jun 1;3(5):389-395.
7
Tonic activity level in the right prefrontal cortex predicts individuals' risk taking.右侧前额叶皮质的紧张性活动水平可预测个体的冒险行为。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):33-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02260.x.
8
Attention and expectation in human predictive learning: the role of uncertainty.人类预测性学习中的注意力与期望:不确定性的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Nov;61(11):1658-68. doi: 10.1080/17470210701643439.
9
Gambling for Gatorade: risk-sensitive decision making for fluid rewards in humans.用佳得乐饮料赌博:人类对液体奖励的风险敏感决策
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):201-7. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0186-8. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
10
Dopaminergic modulation of risk-based decision making.基于风险的决策的多巴胺能调节。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Feb;34(3):681-97. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.121. Epub 2008 Jul 30.