• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电极间记录距离对指部逆行感觉神经动作电位形态的影响。

Effect of interelectrode recording distance on morphology of the antidromic sensory nerve action potentials at the finger.

作者信息

Wee A S, Ashley R A

机构信息

Department of Neurology University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.

出版信息

Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Feb-Mar;30(2):93-6.

PMID:2311573
Abstract

In 15 normal subjects, antidromic median sensory compound nerve action potentials (SCNAPs) were recorded supramaximally from the middle finger with ring electrodes, using different interelectrode recording distances. The onset latencies were identical in all recording instances. The peak latency and amplitude of the major negative deflection continued to increase with increasing interelectrode distance. At and beyond a 4 cm interelectrode recording separation, they both achieved maximum values and did not increase further. On the other hand, the duration and area did continue to increase with increasing interelectrode separation. These findings suggest that in normal individuals, the true onset latency, peak latency, and amplitude are well reflected in the median SCNAP when it is recorded with an interelectrode distance of 4 cm or more at the finger; thus, they can easily be standardized. The SCNAP duration and area, however, are more variable since they both continue to change with increasing interelectrode recording separation without approaching a saturation value.

摘要

在15名正常受试者中,使用不同的电极间记录距离,用环形电极从中指超最大刺激记录逆向正中感觉复合神经动作电位(SCNAPs)。在所有记录情况下,起始潜伏期均相同。主要负向波的峰值潜伏期和波幅随着电极间距离的增加而持续增加。在电极间记录间距达到4厘米及以上时,两者均达到最大值且不再进一步增加。另一方面,波宽和面积确实随着电极间间距的增加而继续增大。这些发现表明,在正常个体中,当在手指处电极间距离为4厘米或更大时记录正中SCNAP,其真正的起始潜伏期、峰值潜伏期和波幅能得到很好的反映;因此,它们很容易标准化。然而,SCNAP的波宽和面积更具变异性,因为它们都随着电极间记录间距的增加而持续变化,且未趋近饱和值。

相似文献

1
Effect of interelectrode recording distance on morphology of the antidromic sensory nerve action potentials at the finger.电极间记录距离对指部逆行感觉神经动作电位形态的影响。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Feb-Mar;30(2):93-6.
2
[Effects of interelectrode separation in sensory nerve conduction studies].[感觉神经传导研究中电极间距的影响]
No To Shinkei. 1999 Aug;51(8):699-702.
3
Nerve conduction studies: orthodromic vs antidromic latencies.神经传导研究:顺向潜伏期与逆向潜伏期
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Jul;71(8):579-82.
4
Effect of interelectrode distance on sural nerve action potential parameters.电极间距对腓肠神经动作电位参数的影响。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;87(3):183-8. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318164aa04.
5
Comparison of the antidromic sensory nerve action potentials obtained from all fingers on the same hand.对同一只手上所有手指的逆行感觉神经动作电位进行比较。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Mar;42(2):125-8.
6
Evoked sensory nerve action potentials: effect of different recording electrodes on distal latencies and amplitudes.诱发感觉神经动作电位:不同记录电极对远端潜伏期和波幅的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Jan;67(1):12-3.
7
The influence of interelectrode distance on bipolar recording of sensory nerve action potential. A mathematical study.电极间距对感觉神经动作电位双极记录的影响。一项数学研究。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Mar;33(2):73-8.
8
Uni- and bipolar surface recording of human nerve responses.人体神经反应的单极和双极表面记录。
Muscle Nerve. 1991 Feb;14(2):133-41. doi: 10.1002/mus.880140208.
9
Anodal block: can this occur during routine nerve conduction studies?阳极阻滞:这会在常规神经传导研究中发生吗?
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Oct-Nov;40(7):387-91.
10
Electrophysiologic analysis of snap amplitude in orthodromic and antidromic studies.
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Sep;34(6):323-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Antidromic vs orthodromic sensory median nerve conduction studies.正中神经感觉神经的逆向与顺向传导研究
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2016 Apr 7;1:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2016.02.004. eCollection 2016.