[What is the value of high resolution electrocardiography in the identification of patients at risk?].

Sudden cardiac death occurs in the Federal Republic of Germany with an incidence of 60,000 to 90,000 per year. Ambulatory ECG monitoring has demonstrated that in about 80% of such events, the heart rhythm before and during sudden cardiac death shows ventricular tachycardia leading to ventricular fibrillation and circulatory standstill. From experimental studies it is known that the substrate for precipitation of the ventricular arrhythmia is localized injury in myocardial tissue with conduction delays and conduction blocks resulting in inhomogeneous spread of the impulse between normal and injured myocardium enabling the existence of an electrical re-entry circuit. Anisotrophy, that is differing velocities of conduction parallel and perpendicular to fiber direction as well as dispersion of repolarization appears responsible for propagation of the circuit. Because of the delayed impulse spread, the late depolarization after the end of the QRS complex can be detected in the ECG as ventricular late potentials by means of high resolution systems. Ventricular late potentials may be regarded as indicative of increased electrical vulnerability of the ventricles. Prevalence of ventricular late potentials: In our own studies using the signal-averaged ECG technique, ventricular late potentials were found most frequently in patients with coronary artery disease and only in 6/100 healthy subjects, in 5/30 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, in none of 30 patients with aortic stenosis or ten with "small vessel disease". With continuously-registered high resolution electrocardiography but not with the signal-averaged ECG, patients with dilated cardiomyopathy or QT-syndrome can be found to have labile, intermittent ventricular late potentials. In patients with coronary artery disease, the number of those in whom ventricular late potentials can only be detected with continuously-registered high resolution ECG in addition to signal-averaged technique lies between 6 and nearly 30%. With respect to frequency analysis of the ST-segment, which is based on the hypothesis that the fractionated signals in arrhythmogenic areas are of higher frequency than the normal low frequency signals of the ST-segment in normal myocardial areas, there is only limited experience and no data from larger collectives.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)