• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为患者提供决策支持:价值观澄清和偏好 elicitation。

Decision support for patients: values clarification and preference elicitation.

机构信息

The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb;70(1 Suppl):50S-79S. doi: 10.1177/1077558712461182. Epub 2012 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1177/1077558712461182
PMID:23124615
Abstract

Providing a patient with decision support involves helping that person to choose among two or more elective health care options. "Values Clarification" and "Preference Elicitation" are integral to the full decision-support process. During values clarification, the patient and clinician gain insight into the importance that the patient ascribes to the options' positive and negative characteristics. During preference elicitation, the patient identifies which options are, overall, personally most favored (and, by corollary, which are least favored). This article identifies the roles that values clarification/preference elicitation (VC/PE) play in the full process of patients' decision support, outlines various approaches to fostering VC/PE, and poses some fundamental and applied research questions about VC/PE. It also argues that, in order to proceed to answer the posed research questions, investigators in the field of patients' decision support require a systematic set of criteria for comparing the performance of different VC/PE techniques.

摘要

为患者提供决策支持包括帮助患者在两种或更多种可选的医疗保健方案中做出选择。“价值观澄清”和“偏好发掘”是完整决策支持过程的组成部分。在价值观澄清过程中,患者和临床医生深入了解患者对方案的积极和消极特征的重视程度。在偏好发掘过程中,患者确定哪些方案总体上是个人最青睐的(相应地,哪些方案是最不青睐的)。本文确定了价值观澄清/偏好发掘(VC/PE)在患者决策支持的整个过程中所扮演的角色,概述了促进 VC/PE 的各种方法,并提出了一些关于 VC/PE 的基础和应用研究问题。它还认为,为了回答提出的研究问题,患者决策支持领域的研究人员需要一套系统的标准来比较不同 VC/PE 技术的性能。

相似文献

1
Decision support for patients: values clarification and preference elicitation.为患者提供决策支持:价值观澄清和偏好 elicitation。
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb;70(1 Suppl):50S-79S. doi: 10.1177/1077558712461182. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
2
Theory-informed design of values clarification methods: a cognitive psychological perspective on patient health-related decision making.基于理论的价值观澄清方法设计:从认知心理学角度看患者健康相关决策
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;77:156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.020. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
3
Improving patient safety through informatics tools for shared decision making and risk communication.通过用于共同决策和风险沟通的信息学工具提高患者安全。
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Aug;73(7-8):551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.05.003.
4
[Patient Decision Aids for Values Clarification and Preference Elicitation - Challenges and Developments].[用于价值观澄清和偏好引出的患者决策辅助工具——挑战与发展]
Ther Umsch. 2022;79(8):415-424. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a001383.
5
Combining deliberation and intuition in patient decision support.在患者决策支持中结合深思熟虑和直觉。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 May;91(2):154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
6
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
7
[Patient treatment preferences elicitation process: a French perspective].[患者治疗偏好的引出过程:法国视角]
Bull Cancer. 2006 Jul;93(7):691-7.
8
Shared decision making in inflammatory bowel disease: helping patients understand the tradeoffs between treatment options.炎症性肠病的共同决策:帮助患者了解治疗方案之间的权衡。
Gut. 2012 Mar;61(3):459-65. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300988. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
9
[Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].[共同决策:增强患者参与康复的一种方法]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):129-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40097.
10
Does the process of deliberation change individuals' health state valuations? An exploratory study using the person trade-off technique.审议过程是否会改变个体对健康状况的估值?一项使用人交换技术的探索性研究。
Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):806-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1633. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical Care Physicians' Perspectives on Nudging in Communication.重症监护医师对沟通中助推策略的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2531199. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31199.
2
Calculating the minimally important difference for the FACT-E from esophageal cancer surgery to recovery using distribution-based methods.使用基于分布的方法计算从食管癌手术到康复阶段FACT-E量表的最小重要差异。
Dis Esophagus. 2025 May 3;38(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaf042.
3
Caregiver Values and Preferences Related to Surgical Decision-Making for Children with Medical Complexity.
与患有复杂疾病儿童手术决策相关的照顾者价值观和偏好
J Pediatr. 2025 Jan;276:114366. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114366. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
4
Are completed ReSPECT plans facilitating person-centred care? An evaluation of completed plans in UK general practice.已完成的《尊重计划》是否促进了以患者为中心的护理?对英国全科医疗中已完成计划的评估。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Sep 21;20:100780. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100780. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Perceived challenges in treatment decision-making for endometriosis: healthcare professional perspectives.子宫内膜异位症治疗决策中察觉到的挑战:医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2024 Aug 1;12(1):2383469. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2383469. eCollection 2024.
6
Exploring Anesthesia Provider Preferences for Precision Feedback: Preference Elicitation Study.探索麻醉师对精准反馈的偏好:偏好 elicitation 研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Jun 11;10:e54071. doi: 10.2196/54071.
7
Primary care patient interests in joining a planned multi-cancer early detection clinical trial.初级保健患者对参加计划中的多癌种早期检测临床试验的兴趣。
Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(10):e7312. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7312.
8
Feasibility and acceptability of chaplain decision coaching on Periviable resuscitation decision quality: A pilot study.牧师决策指导对极早产儿复苏决策质量的可行性与可接受性:一项试点研究。
PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 21;4:100266. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100266. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Real-world observations and impacts of Chinese herbal medicine for migraine: results of a registry-based cohort study.中药治疗偏头痛的真实世界观察与影响:一项基于注册登记的队列研究结果
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 2;15:1330589. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1330589. eCollection 2024.
10
Exploring the information needs of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a content analysis of Facebook group posts.探讨膝骨关节炎患者的信息需求:对 Facebook 群组帖子的内容分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 9;25(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07240-4.