• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体在胸内恶性肿瘤患者的物理治疗师主导的非药物性呼吸困难方案中的体验和影响:一项定性研究。

Individual experiences and impacts of a physiotherapist-led, non-pharmacological breathlessness programme for patients with intrathoracic malignancy: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2013 Jun;27(6):499-507. doi: 10.1177/0269216312464093. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1177/0269216312464093
PMID:23128902
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-pharmacological breathlessness management programmes have been shown to be beneficial in the management of lung cancer-related dyspnoea for more than 10 years. What is not so clear is how they work.

AIM

To evaluate how patients with intrathoracic malignancy (lung cancer or pleural mesothelioma) undergoing the non-pharmacological breathlessness management programmes benefited from the programme, using a qualitative methodology.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Consecutive patients completing the programme were invited to be interviewed (semi-structured and audio-recorded) about their experiences of the programme, what had helped them and how. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

RESULTS

Nine patients were interviewed. Seven major themes emerged, they are summarised as follows: (1) Mixed prior expectations of the programme, (2) flexibility of delivery and additional support needs, (3) physiotherapist attributes and skills in developing an effective helping relationship, (4) adoption of new techniques, (5) the effects and impact of the programme and new techniques, (6) difficulties and barriers to achieving change and (7) facing an uncertain future beyond the programme.

CONCLUSION

The non-pharmacological breathlessness management programme appears to offer a wide range of benefits to patients, including improving functional capacity, coping strategies and self-control. Such benefits are most likely to be due to a combination of breathing control, activity management and the therapist qualities.

摘要

背景

非药物性呼吸困难管理方案在肺癌相关性呼吸困难管理中已显示出 10 多年的益处。但目前尚不清楚其作用机制。

目的

采用定性方法评估接受非药物性呼吸困难管理方案的胸部恶性肿瘤(肺癌或胸膜间皮瘤)患者如何从该方案中获益。

设计和设置

完成该方案的连续患者被邀请接受有关该方案的体验、对其有帮助的内容以及如何帮助的访谈(半结构化和录音)。使用解释性现象学分析对访谈进行转录和分析。

结果

对 9 名患者进行了访谈。出现了 7 个主要主题,概括如下:(1)对方案的期望复杂,(2)交付方式的灵活性和额外的支持需求,(3)物理治疗师在建立有效帮助关系方面的特质和技能,(4)采用新技术,(5)方案和新技术的效果和影响,(6)实现改变的困难和障碍,(7)在方案结束后面临不确定的未来。

结论

非药物性呼吸困难管理方案似乎为患者提供了广泛的益处,包括改善功能能力、应对策略和自我控制。这些益处很可能归因于呼吸控制、活动管理和治疗师特质的综合作用。

相似文献

1
Individual experiences and impacts of a physiotherapist-led, non-pharmacological breathlessness programme for patients with intrathoracic malignancy: a qualitative study.个体在胸内恶性肿瘤患者的物理治疗师主导的非药物性呼吸困难方案中的体验和影响:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jun;27(6):499-507. doi: 10.1177/0269216312464093. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
2
An evaluation of a physiotherapy led non-pharmacological breathlessness programme for patients with intrathoracic malignancy.针对胸腔内恶性肿瘤患者开展的一项由物理治疗主导的非药物性呼吸困难治疗方案评估。
Palliat Med. 2007 Jun;21(4):285-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216307079172.
3
Episodes of breathlessness: types and patterns - a qualitative study exploring experiences of patients with advanced diseases.呼吸困难发作:类型和模式 - 一项探索晚期疾病患者体验的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jun;27(6):524-32. doi: 10.1177/0269216313480255. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
4
A qualitative evaluation of a comprehensive self-management programme for COPD patients: effectiveness from the patients' perspective.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者综合自我管理计划的定性评估:从患者角度看其有效性
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Nov;55(2):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.001.
5
Non-pharmacological intervention for breathlessness in lung cancer.肺癌患者气短的非药物干预
Palliat Med. 1996 Oct;10(4):299-305. doi: 10.1177/026921639601000405.
6
Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness management in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review.肺癌患者呼吸困难管理的非药物干预措施:一项系统综述
Palliat Med. 2008 Sep;22(6):693-701. doi: 10.1177/0269216308095024.
7
"I Can Breathe Again!" Patients' Self-Management Strategies for Episodic Breathlessness in Advanced Disease, Derived From Qualitative Interviews.“我又能呼吸了!” 基于定性访谈得出的晚期疾病发作性呼吸困难患者自我管理策略
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Aug;52(2):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 May 21.
8
A National Health Service Hospital's cardiac rehabilitation programme: a qualitative analysis of provision.一家国民保健服务医院的心脏康复计划:服务提供情况的定性分析
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Oct;16(10):1908-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01815.x.
9
Exercise and relaxation intervention for patients with advanced lung cancer: a qualitative feasibility study.运动和放松干预对晚期肺癌患者的影响:一项定性可行性研究。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012 Dec;22(6):804-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01323.x. Epub 2011 May 23.
10
Insights from Australians with respiratory disease living in the community with experience of self-managing through an emergency department 'near miss' for breathlessness: a strengths-based qualitative study.对居住在社区的患有呼吸系统疾病、有通过急诊科“险些发生的呼吸急促”进行自我管理经历的澳大利亚人的见解:一项基于优势的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 6;7(12):e017536. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017536.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service.一项针对多学科呼吸困难支持服务试点的混合方法评估。
Eval Rev. 2023 Oct;47(5):820-870. doi: 10.1177/0193841X231162402. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
2
Holistic services for people with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.为晚期疾病和慢性呼吸困难患者提供的整体服务:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thorax. 2019 Mar;74(3):270-281. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211589. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
3
Quality of life of survivors of malignant pleural mesothelioma in Japan: a cross sectional study.
日本恶性胸膜间皮瘤幸存者的生活质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4293-x.
4
Is a specialist breathlessness service more effective and cost-effective for patients with advanced cancer and their carers than standard care? Findings of a mixed-method randomised controlled trial.对于晚期癌症患者及其护理人员而言,专科呼吸困难服务是否比标准护理更有效且更具成本效益?一项混合方法随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 31;12:194. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0194-2.
5
Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure does not decrease in elderly subjects.老年受试者的嗅鼻吸气压力不会降低。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Sep;26(9):1509-13. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1509. Epub 2014 Sep 17.