Müller Sascha A, Tarantino Ignazio, Martin David J, Schmied Bruno M
Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2012;196:53-64. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31629-6_4.
Pancreatic cancer is one of the five leading causes of cancer death for both males and females in the western world. More than 85 % pancreatic tumors are of ductal origin but the incidence of cystic tumors such as intrapapillary mucinous tumors (IPMN) or mucinous cystic tumors (MCN) and other rare tumors is rising. Complete surgical resection of the tumor is the mainstay of any curative therapeutic approach, however, up to 40 % of patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer are not offered surgery. This is despite 5-year survival rates of up to 40 % or even higher in selected patients depending on tumor stage and histology. Standard procedures for pancreatic tumors include the Kausch-Whipple- or pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure, and the left lateral pancreatic resection (often with splenectomy), and usually include regional lymphadenectomy. More radical or extended pancreatic operations are becoming increasingly utilised however and we examine the data available for their role. These operations include major venous and arterial resection, multivisceral resections and surgery for metastatic disease, or palliative pancreatic resection. Portal vein resection for local infiltration with or without replacement graft is now well established and does not deleteriously affect perioperative morbidity or mortality. Arterial resection, however, though often technically feasible, has questionable oncologic impact, is not without risk and is usually reserved for isolated cases. The value of extended lymphadenectomy is frequently debated; the recent level I evidence demonstrates no advantage. Multivisceral resections, i.e. tumors, often in the tail of the pancreas, with invasion of the colon or stomach or other surrounding tissues, while associated with an increased morbidity and a longer hospital stay, do however show comparable mortality-and survival rates to those without such infiltration and therefore should be performed if technically feasible. Routine resection for metastatic disease however does not seem to show any advantage over palliative treatment but may be an option in selected patients with easily removable metastases. In conclusion pancreatic surgery beyond the traditional limits is established in tumors infiltration the venous system and may be a considered approach in selected patients with locally infiltrating pancreatic cancer or metastasis.
在西方世界,胰腺癌是男性和女性癌症死亡的五大主要原因之一。超过85%的胰腺肿瘤起源于导管,但诸如导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)或黏液性囊性肿瘤(MCN)等囊性肿瘤以及其他罕见肿瘤的发病率正在上升。肿瘤的完整手术切除是任何根治性治疗方法的主要手段,然而,高达40%的潜在可切除胰腺癌患者未接受手术。尽管根据肿瘤分期和组织学情况,部分患者的5年生存率可达40%甚至更高。胰腺肿瘤的标准手术包括考施-惠普尔手术或保留幽门的惠普尔手术,以及左侧胰腺切除术(通常联合脾切除术),通常还包括区域淋巴结清扫术。然而,越来越多的人采用更激进或扩大的胰腺手术,我们将研究有关其作用的现有数据。这些手术包括主要静脉和动脉切除、多脏器切除以及转移性疾病手术或姑息性胰腺切除。目前,门静脉切除联合或不联合置换移植物治疗局部浸润已得到充分认可,且不会对围手术期发病率或死亡率产生不利影响。然而,动脉切除虽然在技术上通常可行,但其肿瘤学影响存在疑问,并非没有风险,通常仅适用于个别病例。扩大淋巴结清扫术的价值经常受到争议;最近的一级证据表明其并无优势。多脏器切除,即通常位于胰尾的肿瘤侵犯结肠、胃或其他周围组织,虽然会增加发病率和延长住院时间,但与未发生此类浸润的患者相比,死亡率和生存率相当,因此如果技术可行就应进行手术。然而,常规的转移性疾病切除术似乎并不比姑息治疗更具优势,但对于某些转移灶易于切除的患者可能是一种选择。总之,超出传统范围的胰腺手术在肿瘤浸润静脉系统的情况下已得到确立,对于局部浸润性胰腺癌或转移患者,在某些情况下可能是一种可考虑的方法。