Vafaee Fariborz, Khoshhal Masoumeh, Rezaei Aliakbar, Sooltani Fereidon, Jalalzadeh Mohsen, Yalpaniyan Ali, Firooz Farnaz, Izady Ali Reza, Yarmohamadi Ebrahim
Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School/Dental Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Iran Endod J. 2010 Summer;5(3):125-30. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
The resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with esthetic post systems has not been extensively researched. This in vitro study compared the fracture patterns of endodontically treated teeth with esthetic post systems with different analysis methods.
A total of 26 recently extracted human maxillary central incisors were decoronated and then endodontically treated. Teeth were restored with quartz fiber posts. All posts were cemented with Panavia dual curing adhesive resin cement and subsequently restored with composite cores. Three methods were used to test fracture resistance. Each specimen was embedded in acrylic resin and then secured in a universal load-testing machine. A compressive load was applied at 135º degree angle at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min to the long axis of the tooth until fracture occurred. The two other methods, finite element analysis (FEA) and photo elastic study used the same angulation and 90 N force to simulate the first method. The data were then compared.
Clinical results indicated that fracture was most likely to occur between core and dentin, and then in the cervical 1/3 of the root. Photo elastic study demonstrated similar results; the highest stresses occurred at the junction of dentin and core contralateral to the side where force was applied. FEA also confirmed these results; however it also showed that the highest stresses arise at the dentin/core junction contralateral to the force point.
All three techniques reiterate that the risk of fracture is greatest at the cervical dentin/core junction.
使用美观桩系统修复的根管治疗牙齿的抗折性尚未得到广泛研究。这项体外研究比较了使用不同分析方法的美观桩系统修复的根管治疗牙齿的折裂模式。
总共26颗近期拔除的人上颌中切牙被去冠,然后进行根管治疗。牙齿用石英纤维桩修复。所有桩均用Panavia双固化粘结树脂水门汀粘结,随后用复合树脂核修复。使用三种方法测试抗折性。每个标本嵌入丙烯酸树脂中,然后固定在万能载荷试验机中。以1毫米/分钟的十字头速度在与牙齿长轴呈135°角的方向施加压缩载荷,直至发生折裂。另外两种方法,有限元分析(FEA)和光弹性研究,使用相同的角度和90N的力来模拟第一种方法。然后对数据进行比较。
临床结果表明,折裂最有可能发生在核与牙本质之间,然后发生在牙根的颈部1/3处。光弹性研究显示了类似的结果;最高应力出现在与施力侧相对的牙本质与核的交界处。有限元分析也证实了这些结果;然而,它还表明最高应力出现在与施力点相对的牙本质/核交界处。
所有三种技术都重申,颈部牙本质/核交界处的折裂风险最大。