Department of Angiology, University Hospital, University of Basel, Switzerland (E.S., S.I., D.S., K.-H.L., K.A.J.).
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Feb;1(1):51-6. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.111.000067. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
This study sought to determine possible effects of different antiplatelet therapies on walking exercise performance in intermittent claudication. Aspirin, in contrast to clopidogrel, interferes with processes that increase collateral conductance in an ischemic animal model.
Patients with stable intermittent claudication were recruited from 21 centers in Switzerland and Germany and randomized to either aspirin or clopidogrel treatment. They participated in a 3-month rehabilitation program (electronically monitored, home-based, 1-hour daily walking sessions at a speed of approximately 120 steps/min). Walking distance was assessed by treadmill tests (3.2 km/h; 12% grade) at baseline and after 12 weeks. A total of 229 of 259 patients with a mean age of 66.2±7.7 years completed the study according to the protocol. A total of 24.5% were females, 20.1% diabetics, and 85.6% were active/ex-smokers. The baseline characteristics were a median (interquartile range) ankle/brachial index of 0.69 (0.57±0.8), an initial claudication distance (ICD) of 98 m (70 to 151 m), and an absolute claudication distance (ACD) of 162 m (113 to 302 m). Training resulted in a median increase of initial claudication distance by 33.5 m (33.3%) in the clopidogrel group and 29 m (33.9%) in the aspirin group. The values for absolute claudication distance were 60.5 m (34.9%) and 75 m (35.3%), respectively (p(ICD)=0.42 and p(ACD)=0.66).
Treatment with aspirin did not show a difference in initial claudication distance or absolute claudication distance improvements compared with clopidogrel after a 3-month walking rehabilitation program. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:51-56.)
URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00189618, URL: https://EudraCT.ema.europa.eu, Unique identifier: 2004-005041-35.
本研究旨在确定不同抗血小板治疗方案对间歇性跛行患者行走运动表现的可能影响。与氯吡格雷相比,阿司匹林会干扰增加缺血动物模型侧支传导的过程。
本研究从瑞士和德国的 21 个中心招募了稳定型间歇性跛行患者,并将其随机分为阿司匹林或氯吡格雷治疗组。他们参加了为期 3 个月的康复计划(电子监测,家庭为基础,每天 1 小时,速度约为 120 步/分钟)。在基线和 12 周后,通过跑步机测试(3.2km/h;12%坡度)评估行走距离。共有 259 例患者中的 229 例(平均年龄 66.2±7.7 岁)按方案完成了研究。其中女性占 24.5%,糖尿病患者占 20.1%,活跃/戒烟者占 85.6%。基线特征为踝肱指数中位数(四分位距)为 0.69(0.57±0.8),初始跛行距离(ICD)为 98m(70151m),绝对跛行距离(ACD)为 162m(113302m)。氯吡格雷组和阿司匹林组的训练结果分别使初始跛行距离中位数增加了 33.5m(33.3%)和 29m(33.9%)。绝对跛行距离分别增加了 60.5m(34.9%)和 75m(35.3%)(p(ICD)=0.42 和 p(ACD)=0.66)。
与氯吡格雷相比,在 3 个月的步行康复计划后,阿司匹林治疗并未显示在初始跛行距离或绝对跛行距离改善方面存在差异。(美国心脏协会杂志。2012;1:51-56)。