Desmettre Thibaut, Yeguiayan Jean-Michel, Coadou Hervé, Jacquot Claude, Raux Mathieu, Vivien Benoit, Martin Claude, Bonithon-Kopp Claire, Freysz Marc
Crit Care. 2012 Sep 28;16(5):R170. doi: 10.1186/cc11647.
The benefits of transporting severely injured patients by helicopter remain controversial. This study aimed to analyze the impact on mortality of helicopter compared to ground transport directly from the scene to a University hospital trauma center.
The French Intensive Care Research for Severe Trauma cohort study enrolled 2,703 patients with severe blunt trauma requiring admission to University hospital intensive care units within 72 hours. Pre-hospital and hospital clinical data, including the mode of transport, (helicopter (HMICU) versus ground (GMICU), both with medical teams), were recorded. The analysis was restricted to patients admitted directly from the scene to a University hospital trauma center. The main endpoint was mortality until ICU discharge.
Of the 1,958 patients analyzed, 74% were transported by GMICU, 26% by HMICU. Median injury severity score (ISS) was 26 (interquartile range (IQR) 19 to 34) for HMICU patients and 25 (IQR 18 to 34) for GMICU patients. Compared to GMICU, HMICU patients had a higher median time frame before hospital admission and were more intensively treated in the pre-hospital phase. Crude mortality until hospital discharge was the same regardless of pre-hospital mode of transport. After adjustment for initial status, the risk of death was significantly lower (odds ratio (OR): 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 0.98, P = 0.035) for HMICU compared with GMICU. This result did not change after further adjustment for ISS and overall surgical procedures.
This study suggests a beneficial impact of helicopter transport on mortality in severe blunt trauma. Whether this association could be due to better management in the pre-hospital phase needs to be more thoroughly assessed.
直升机转运重伤患者的益处仍存在争议。本研究旨在分析与从现场直接通过地面转运至大学医院创伤中心相比,直升机转运对死亡率的影响。
法国重症创伤重症监护研究队列研究纳入了2703例严重钝性创伤患者,这些患者需要在72小时内入住大学医院重症监护病房。记录了院前和医院临床数据,包括转运方式(直升机(HMICU)与地面(GMICU),均配备医疗团队)。分析仅限于从现场直接入住大学医院创伤中心的患者。主要终点是直至重症监护病房出院的死亡率。
在分析的1958例患者中,74%通过GMICU转运,26%通过HMICU转运。HMICU患者的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)中位数为26(四分位间距(IQR)19至34),GMICU患者为25(IQR 18至34)。与GMICU相比,HMICU患者入院前的中位时间更长,且在院前阶段接受的治疗更强化。无论院前转运方式如何,直至出院的粗死亡率相同。在对初始状态进行调整后,与GMICU相比,HMICU的死亡风险显著更低(比值比(OR):0.68,95%置信区间(CI)0.47至0.98,P = 0.035)。在对ISS和总体外科手术进行进一步调整后,这一结果未改变。
本研究表明直升机转运对严重钝性创伤的死亡率有有益影响。这种关联是否归因于院前阶段更好的管理,需要更全面地评估。