Department of Geography, East Carolina University, 213 A Brewster, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Environ Manage. 2013 Jan;51(1):182-97. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9966-7. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
Landscape-level green infrastructure creates a network of natural and semi-natural areas that protects and enhances ecosystem services, regenerative capacities, and ecological dynamism over long timeframes. It can also enhance quality of life and certain economic activity. Highways create a network for moving goods and services efficiently, enabling commerce, and improving mobility. A fundamentally profound conflict exists between transportation planning and green infrastructure planning because they both seek to create connected, functioning networks across the same landscapes and regions, but transportation networks, especially in the form of highways, fragment and disconnect green infrastructure networks. A key opportunity has emerged in the United States during the last ten years with the promotion of measures to link transportation and environmental concerns. In this article we examined the potential benefits and challenges of linking landscape-level green infrastructure planning and implementation with integrated transportation planning and highway project development in the United States policy context. This was done by establishing a conceptual model that identified logical flow lines from planning to implementation as well as the potential interconnectors between green infrastructure and highway infrastructure. We analyzed the relationship of these activities through literature review, policy analysis, and a case study of a suburban Maryland, USA landscape. We found that regionally developed and adopted green infrastructure plans can be instrumental in creating more responsive regional transportation plans and streamlining the project environmental review process while enabling better outcomes by enabling more targeted mitigation. In order for benefits to occur, however, landscape-scale green infrastructure assessments and plans must be in place before integrated transportation planning and highway project development occurs. It is in the transportation community's interests to actively facilitate green infrastructure planning because it creates a more predictable environmental review context. On the other hand, for landscape-level green infrastructure, transportation planning and development is much more established and better funded and can provide a means of supporting green infrastructure planning and implementation, thereby enhancing conservation of ecological function.
景观水平的绿色基础设施构建了一个由自然和半自然区域组成的网络,能够在长时间内保护和增强生态系统服务、再生能力和生态活力。它还可以提高生活质量和某些经济活动。高速公路构建了一个高效运输货物和服务的网络,促进商业活动并提高流动性。由于两者都试图在相同的景观和区域内创建相互连接、功能齐全的网络,因此交通规划和绿色基础设施规划之间存在着深刻的根本冲突,但交通网络(尤其是高速公路的形式)会使绿色基础设施网络碎片化和断开连接。在美国,过去十年中出现了一个重要的机会,即推动将交通和环境问题联系起来的措施。本文探讨了在美国政策背景下,将景观水平的绿色基础设施规划和实施与综合交通规划和高速公路项目开发联系起来的潜在好处和挑战。这是通过建立一个概念模型来实现的,该模型确定了从规划到实施的逻辑流程线以及绿色基础设施和高速公路基础设施之间的潜在连接。我们通过文献综述、政策分析以及美国马里兰州郊区的案例研究来分析这些活动之间的关系。我们发现,区域内制定和采用的绿色基础设施规划可以为创建更具响应性的区域交通规划和简化项目环境审查过程提供有力支持,同时通过实现更有针对性的缓解措施,使结果更加理想。然而,为了实现这些好处,在进行综合交通规划和高速公路项目开发之前,必须制定景观规模的绿色基础设施评估和规划。交通社区积极促进绿色基础设施规划符合其利益,因为这可以创造一个更可预测的环境审查环境。另一方面,对于景观级别的绿色基础设施而言,交通规划和开发更加成熟,资金也更充足,因此可以为绿色基础设施规划和实施提供支持,从而增强生态功能的保护。