Klinefelter D, Pancoast D L, Archer R P, Pruitt D L
Old Dominion University, Richmond, VA.
J Pers Assess. 1990 Spring;54(1-2):379-89. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674001.
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) norms developed by Marks and Briggs (1967/1972) have served as the standard adolescent norms used for over 10 years. Additional adolescent norms have recently been produced by Gottesman, Hanson, Kroeker, and Briggs (1987) and by Colligan and Offord (1989), thereby providing MMPI users with a potential choice of adolescent norms. Our study examines the effects of these adolescent norm sets on single-scale and profile elevations. In addition, we examine the ability of these norm sets to generate T-score values that would serve to discriminate accurately among adolescents in outpatient (n = 100), inpatient (n = 100), and normal (n = 100) settings. Results indicated that the choice of adolescent norms resulted in important differences in profile elevation. Findings from the discriminant function analyses, however, indicated that these normative sets were roughly equivalent in discriminating among adolescents in the three settings.
马克斯和布里格斯(1967/1972)制定的明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)常模,在过去10多年里一直作为标准的青少年常模使用。最近,戈特斯曼、汉森、克罗克和布里格斯(1987)以及科利根和奥福德(1989)又编制了其他青少年常模,从而为MMPI的使用者提供了青少年常模的多种选择。我们的研究考察了这些青少年常模组对单量表得分和剖面图得分的影响。此外,我们还考察了这些常模组生成T分数值的能力,这些T分数值应能准确区分门诊(n = 100)、住院(n = 100)和正常(n = 100)环境中的青少年。结果表明,青少年常模的选择导致剖面图得分出现重要差异。然而,判别函数分析的结果表明,这些常模组在区分三种环境中的青少年方面大致相当。