Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jan;51(1):224-31. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02423-12. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
The anterior nares are the site of choice for the Veterans Administration methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surveillance program; however, a correlation between nares colonization and concomitant wound infections has not been well established. The purpose of this study was 3-fold: to determine the relatedness of MRSA isolates from 40 paired wound and nares specimens by four different strain typing methods, to determine concordance of typing methods, and to establish a baseline of MRSA types at this medical center. Isolates were typed by repetitive PCR (rep-PCR) (DiversiLab System; DL) and SpectraCell Raman analysis (SCRA) (commercially available methods that can be performed within a clinical lab), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and an antibiotic susceptibility profile (AB). Whole-genome optical mapping (WGM) (OpGen, Inc.) was performed on selected isolates. All methods agreed that 26 pairs were indistinguishable and four pairs were different. Discrepant results were as follows: 4 where only SCRA was discordant, 3 where only AB was discordant, 2 where both DL and AB were discordant, and 1 where both DL and SCRA were discordant. All WGM agreed with PFGE. After discrepancy resolution, 80% of the pairs were indistinguishable and 20% were different. A total of 56% of nares results were nonpredictive if negative nares and positive wound cultures are included. Methods agreed 85 to 93% of the time; however, congruence of isolates to a clade was lower. Baseline analysis of types showed that 15 pairs were unique to single patients (30 strains, 38%; 47% of the matching pairs). Twenty-five strains (30%) represented a single clade identical by PFGE, SCRA, and DL, decreasing specificity. Typing method and institutional type frequency are important in assessing MRSA strain relatedness.
前鼻孔是退伍军人管理局耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)监测计划的首选部位;然而,鼻内定植与同时发生的伤口感染之间的相关性尚未得到很好的确定。本研究的目的有三个:用四种不同的菌株分型方法确定 40 对伤口和鼻内标本中分离的 MRSA 菌株之间的相关性,确定分型方法的一致性,并确定该医疗中心的 MRSA 类型基线。使用重复 PCR(rep-PCR)(DiversiLab 系统;DL)和 SpectraCell 拉曼分析(SCRA)(可在临床实验室中进行的商业上可获得的方法)、脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)和抗生素敏感性谱(AB)对分离物进行分型。对选定的分离物进行全基因组光学作图(WGM)(OpGen,Inc.)。所有方法均一致认为 26 对不可区分,4 对不同。结果不一致的情况如下:4 例仅 SCRA 不一致,3 例仅 AB 不一致,2 例 DL 和 AB 均不一致,1 例 DL 和 SCRA 均不一致。所有 WGM 均与 PFGE 一致。解决差异后,80%的对不可区分,20%的不同。如果包括阴性鼻腔和阳性伤口培养物,那么鼻腔结果的 56%不可预测。方法的一致性为 85%至 93%;然而,分离物与分支的一致性较低。对类型的基线分析表明,15 对仅存在于单个患者(30 株,38%;匹配对的 47%)。25 株(30%)通过 PFGE、SCRA 和 DL 代表单一相同的分支,降低了特异性。评估 MRSA 菌株相关性时,分型方法和机构类型频率很重要。