Suppr超能文献

评估患病儿童社区病例管理护理质量方法的比较:在马拉维与社区卫生工作者的应用

Comparison of methods for assessing quality of care for community case management of sick children: an application with community health workers in Malawi.

作者信息

Cardemil Cristina V, Gilroy Kate E, Callaghan-Koru Jennifer A, Nsona Humphreys, Bryce Jennifer

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):127-136. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0389.

Abstract

Direct observation (DO) with re-examination (RE) by a skilled clinician is a rigorous method for assessing health worker performance, but is not always feasible. We assessed the performance of 131 community health workers in Malawi in community case management of sick children with cough and fast breathing, fever, and diarrhea. We compared estimates of correct treatment measured through DO with RE (n = 382 cases) to DO only (n = 382 cases), register review (n = 1,219 cases), and case scenarios (n = 917 cases). Estimates of correct treatment of uncomplicated fever and diarrhea measured through DO only, register review, and case scenarios were within 9 percentage points of DO with RE estimates, while estimates for uncomplicated cough and fast breathing, and severe illness were substantially higher than DO with RE (12-51 percentage points above the estimate). Those planning for community health worker assessments in community case management can use these results to make an informed choice of methods on the basis of their objectives and the local context.

摘要

由熟练的临床医生进行直接观察(DO)并重新检查(RE)是评估卫生工作者绩效的一种严格方法,但并非总是可行。我们评估了马拉维131名社区卫生工作者对患有咳嗽、呼吸急促、发烧和腹泻的患病儿童进行社区病例管理的绩效。我们将通过DO与RE测量的正确治疗估计值(n = 382例)与仅通过DO测量的估计值(n = 382例)、登记册审查(n = 1219例)和病例情景(n = 917例)进行了比较。仅通过DO、登记册审查和病例情景测量的单纯性发烧和腹泻的正确治疗估计值与DO和RE估计值相差在9个百分点以内,而单纯性咳嗽和呼吸急促以及严重疾病的估计值则比DO和RE的估计值高得多(比估计值高出12 - 51个百分点)。那些计划在社区病例管理中评估社区卫生工作者的人可以利用这些结果,根据其目标和当地情况做出明智的方法选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7d8/3748513/0f4b6f220f84/tropmed-87-127-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验