Department of Bioengineering, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Nov 7;94(21):1984-95. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00439.
Understanding the effectiveness of frozen as compared with fresh osteochondral allografts at six months after surgery and the resultant consequences of traditional freezing may facilitate in vivo maintenance of cartilage integrity. Our hypothesis was that the state of the allograft at implantation affects its performance after six months in vivo.
The effect of frozen as compared with fresh storage on in vivo allograft performance was determined for osteochondral allografts that were transplanted into seven recipient goats and analyzed at six months. Allograft performance was assessed by examining osteochondral structure (cartilage thickness, fill, surface location, surface degeneration, and bone-cartilage interface location), zonal cartilage composition (cellularity, matrix content), and cartilage biomechanical function (stiffness). Relationships between cartilage stiffness or cartilage composition and surface degeneration were assessed with use of linear regression.
Fresh allografts maintained cartilage load-bearing function, while also maintaining zonal organization of cartilage cellularity and matrix content, compared with frozen allografts. Overall, allograft performance was similar between fresh allografts and nonoperative controls. However, cartilage stiffness was approximately 80% lower (95% confidence interval [CI], 73% to 87%) in the frozen allografts than in the nonoperative controls or fresh allografts. Concomitantly, in frozen allografts, matrix content and cellularity were approximately 55% (95% CI, 22% to 92%) and approximately 96% (95% CI, 94% to 99%) lower, respectively, than those in the nonoperative controls and fresh allografts. Cartilage stiffness correlated positively with cartilage cellularity and matrix content, and negatively with surface degeneration.
Maintenance of cartilage load-bearing function in allografts is associated with zonal maintenance of cartilage cellularity and matrix content. In this animal model, frozen allografts displayed signs of failure at six months, with cartilage softening, loss of cells and matrix, and/or graft subsidence, supporting the importance of maintaining cell viability during allograft storage and suggesting that outcomes at six months may be indicative of long-term (dys)function.
Fresh versus frozen allografts represent the "best versus worst" conditions with respect to chondrocyte viability, but "difficult versus simple" with respect to acquisition and distribution. The outcomes described from these two conditions expand the current understanding of in vivo cartilage remodeling and describe structural properties (initial graft subsidence), which may have implications for impending graft failure.
了解手术后六个月冷冻与新鲜同种异体骨软骨移植物的效果,以及传统冷冻的后果,可能有助于在体内维持软骨完整性。我们的假设是移植物在植入时的状态会影响其在体内六个月后的性能。
将冷冻与新鲜储存对移植到 7 只受体山羊体内并在六个月时进行分析的同种异体骨软骨移植物的体内移植物性能进行了比较。通过检查软骨厚度、填充、表面位置、表面退变和骨软骨界面位置,评估同种异体移植物的性能。评估了软骨生物力学功能(硬度)和软骨组成(细胞活力、基质含量)。使用线性回归评估软骨硬度或软骨组成与表面退变之间的关系。
与冷冻同种异体移植物相比,新鲜同种异体移植物保持了软骨的负重功能,同时也保持了软骨细胞活力和基质含量的区域组织。总体而言,新鲜同种异体移植物与非手术对照组之间的移植物性能相似。然而,冷冻同种异体移植物的软骨硬度约低 80%(95%置信区间 [CI],73%至 87%),而非手术对照组或新鲜同种异体移植物。同时,在冷冻同种异体移植物中,基质含量和细胞活力分别约低 55%(95%CI,22%至 92%)和 96%(95%CI,94%至 99%),而非手术对照组和新鲜同种异体移植物。软骨硬度与软骨细胞活力和基质含量呈正相关,与表面退变呈负相关。
同种异体移植物保持软骨负重功能与软骨细胞活力和基质含量的区域维持有关。在这个动物模型中,冷冻同种异体移植物在六个月时显示出失效迹象,表现为软骨软化、细胞和基质丢失,或/和移植物下沉,支持在同种异体移植物储存过程中保持细胞活力的重要性,并表明六个月时的结果可能预示着长期(功能)障碍。
新鲜与冷冻同种异体移植物代表了软骨细胞活力方面的“最佳与最差”情况,但在获取和分布方面则是“困难与简单”的情况。从这两种情况中描述的结果扩展了目前对体内软骨重塑的理解,并描述了结构特性(初始移植物下沉),这可能对即将发生的移植物失效产生影响。