*Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and †Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 20;38(9):718-25. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827bf204.
Cross-sectional analysis of patient-reported preoperative data.
To develop a valid and reliable patient-derived expectations survey for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.
Measuring expectations is an important component in the assessment of patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. However, there currently are no uniform methods to measure expectations.
This study was conducted in 3 phases. In phase 1, patients were queried with open-ended questions about what they expected as a result of surgery. Their responses were grouped into categories that became the items in the draft survey. During phase 2, another group of patients completed the draft survey twice to establish test-retest reliability. In phase 3, items were selected on the basis of concordance and clinical relevance and a scoring rubric was developed.
Phase 1: 25 patients with radiculopathy, myelopathy, or previous surgery with failed fusion (nonunion) (mean age, 55 yr, 44% women) volunteered 114 expectations from which 31 categories were discerned and became the items in the draft survey. Phase 2: another 25 patients completed the survey twice before surgery, a mean of 5 days apart. Phase 3: 21 items were retained for the final survey addressing pain, numbness, physical limitations, and psychological well-being. An overall score can be calculated ranging from 0 to 100 that incorporates number of items expected and degree of improvement expected. For patients in phase 2, scores for the first and second administrations were 58 and 57, Cronbach α coefficients were 0.90 and 0.93, and the intraclass correlation coefficient between scores was 0.90.
We developed a valid and reliable patient-derived expectations survey for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery that addresses expectations for physical and psychological well-being and generates an easy-to-interpret overall score. The survey can be used clinically and for research and fills a gap in the comprehensive preoperative assessment of patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.
患者术前报告数据的横断面分析。
为行颈椎手术的患者开发一种有效且可靠的基于患者的预期调查。
测量预期是评估行颈椎手术患者的重要组成部分。然而,目前尚无统一的方法来测量预期。
本研究分 3 个阶段进行。在第 1 阶段,患者被询问有关手术结果的预期的开放式问题。他们的回答被分为类别,这些类别成为草案调查的项目。在第 2 阶段,另一组患者两次完成草案调查以建立测试-重测可靠性。在第 3 阶段,根据一致性和临床相关性选择项目,并制定评分表。
第 1 阶段:25 名神经根病、脊髓病或既往手术融合失败(不愈合)的患者(平均年龄 55 岁,44%为女性)自愿提出了 114 种预期,从中得出 31 个类别,并成为草案调查的项目。第 2 阶段:另外 25 名患者在手术前两次完成调查,平均相隔 5 天。第 3 阶段:保留了 21 个最终调查项目,涉及疼痛、麻木、身体限制和心理幸福感。可以计算出一个总分,范围从 0 到 100,包含预期的项目数量和预期的改善程度。对于第 2 阶段的患者,第一次和第二次的得分分别为 58 和 57,Cronbach α 系数分别为 0.90 和 0.93,得分之间的组内相关系数为 0.90。
我们为行颈椎手术的患者开发了一种有效且可靠的基于患者的预期调查,该调查涉及身体和心理幸福感的预期,并生成易于解释的总体得分。该调查可用于临床和研究,填补了颈椎手术患者全面术前评估的空白。