Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address for C.A. Mancuso:
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Oct 2;95(19):1793-800. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00338.
Patients' expectations of lumbar spine surgery have not been obtained with valid and reliable scales derived from patients' perspectives. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to develop and to test a patient-derived expectations survey.
The survey was developed in three phases. Phase 1 involved interviews with patients with open-ended questions about expectations and assembly of a draft survey. Phase 2 involved administering the survey twice to assess test-retest reliability. Phase 3 involved selection of final items based on concordance of responses and clinical relevance, and the development of a scoring rubric.
In Phase 1, 118 preoperative patients with diverse lumbar spine diagnoses volunteered 583 expectations, from which thirty-one discrete categories were discerned and became the items for the draft survey. In Phase 2, another fifty-six preoperative patients completed the draft survey twice, four days apart. In Phase 3, twenty-one items were retained for the final survey addressing symptom relief, return to basic mobility, resumption of activities, and improvement in psychosocial well-being. An overall score was calculated on the basis of the number of expectations and amount of improvement expected and ranged from 0 to 100 points; a higher score indicates more expectations. For patients in Phase 2, the mean scores for both administrations were 66 and 65 points, the Cronbach alpha coefficients for both administrations were 0.90 and 0.92, and the intraclass correlation coefficient between scores was 0.86.
We developed a patient-derived survey that is valid, reliable, and applicable to diverse diagnoses and includes physical and psychosocial expectations. The survey generates an overall score that is easy to calculate and to interpret, and thus fills a gap in the assessment of lumbar spine surgery by offering a practical and comprehensive way to record patients' expectations.
患者对腰椎手术的期望尚未通过源自患者角度的有效且可靠的量表来获得。本横断面研究的目的是开发并测试一种源自患者的期望调查。
该调查分三个阶段进行。第 1 阶段包括对患者进行访谈,采用开放式问题了解他们对手术的期望,并编写一份调查草稿。第 2 阶段涉及两次施测该调查以评估测试-重测信度。第 3 阶段基于患者的回应一致性和临床相关性来选择最终条目,并制定评分细则。
在第 1 阶段,583 名患有不同腰椎疾病的术前患者自愿参加了访谈,他们提出了 583 种期望,从中得出了 31 个离散类别,这些类别成为了调查草稿的条目。在第 2 阶段,另外 56 名术前患者在四天的间隔内两次完成了调查草稿。在第 3 阶段,保留了 21 项最终调查内容,涉及症状缓解、基本活动能力恢复、活动恢复以及心理社会幸福感改善。总分是根据期望的数量和改善程度计算得出,范围为 0 至 100 分;分数越高,表示期望越高。对于第 2 阶段的患者,两次测试的平均得分均为 66 分和 65 分,两次测试的 Cronbach α 系数分别为 0.90 和 0.92,两次测试得分的组内相关系数为 0.86。
我们开发了一种源自患者的调查,该调查具有有效性、可靠性和适用性,可适用于不同的诊断,并包含身体和心理社会期望。该调查生成了一个易于计算和解释的总体得分,从而通过提供一种实用且全面的记录患者期望的方法来填补腰椎手术评估的空白。