Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Yawkey 6A, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;73(10):1328-34. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07770.
To determine the risk for bipolar I disorder in first-degree relatives of children with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder via meta-analysis and expanded controlled study.
For the meta-analysis, PubMed was searched for scientific articles published in the world literature in English through 2011. The keywords searched were bipolar disorder, first-degree relatives, family study, and control. All online abstracts were reviewed, and relevant full manuscripts were collected and reviewed. Citations were also examined for other potentially relevant articles. The analysis included only controlled family studies that examined rates of bipolar I disorder in all first-degree relatives (parents and siblings) of pediatric bipolar I probands and that had age- and sex-matched controls. Family history studies were excluded, as were studies that were not in English, did not report bipolar I rates for all first-degree relatives, or reported only bipolar spectrum rates. Also excluded were family studies that included only adult probands. A meta-analysis was conducted of the 5 controlled family studies of pediatric bipolar I probands that met the search criteria using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird.
For the family study, our previous sample of DSM-IV bipolar I probands was greatly expanded using structured diagnostic interviews. The new study included 239 children aged 6-17 years who satisfied full DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for bipolar I disorder (n = 726 first-degree relatives), 162 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) probands (without bipolar I disorder; n = 511 first-degree relatives), and 136 healthy control probands (without ADHD or bipolar I disorder; n = 411 first-degree relatives). The Kaplan-Meier cumulative failure function was used to calculate survival curves and cumulative lifetime risk in relatives. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the risk of bipolar I disorder in relatives.
The pooled odds ratio for bipolar I disorder in relatives was estimated to be 6.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-10.1). First-degree relatives of bipolar I probands were also significantly more likely than first-degree relatives of both ADHD probands (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.85-4.93; P < .001) and control probands (HR = 2.83; 95% CI, 1.65-4.84; P < .001) to have bipolar I disorder.
Our results document an increased familial risk for bipolar I disorder in relatives of pediatric probands with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder.
通过荟萃分析和扩展对照研究,确定 DSM-IV 双相 I 障碍患儿一级亲属中双相 I 障碍的风险。
为了进行荟萃分析,通过 2011 年在世界文献中以英文发表的科学文章,在 PubMed 上搜索了关键词为“双相障碍、一级亲属、家族研究和对照”的文献。审查了所有在线摘要,并收集和审查了相关的全文。还检查了引文以获取其他潜在相关文章。该分析仅包括对照家族研究,这些研究检查了儿科双相 I 患者所有一级亲属(父母和兄弟姐妹)的双相 I 障碍发生率,并具有年龄和性别匹配的对照组。排除了家族史研究,也排除了不是英文的研究、未报告所有一级亲属的双相 I 发生率或仅报告双相谱发生率的研究。还排除了仅包括成年患者的家族研究。使用 DerSimonian 和 Laird 的随机效应模型对符合搜索标准的 5 项儿科双相 I 患者对照家族研究进行了荟萃分析。
对于家族研究,我们以前的 DSM-IV 双相 I 患者样本通过结构化诊断访谈得到了极大扩展。新研究包括 239 名年龄在 6-17 岁之间符合 DSM-IV 双相 I 障碍完全诊断标准的儿童(n = 726 名一级亲属),162 名注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)患者(无双相 I 障碍;n = 511 名一级亲属)和 136 名健康对照患者(无 ADHD 或双相 I 障碍;n = 411 名一级亲属)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 累积失败函数计算亲属的生存曲线和累积终生风险。使用 Cox 比例风险模型计算亲属患双相 I 障碍的风险。
一级亲属患双相 I 障碍的合并优势比估计为 6.96(95%置信区间[CI],4.8-10.1)。与 ADHD 患者一级亲属(危险比[HR] = 3.02;95%CI,1.85-4.93;P <.001)和对照组一级亲属(HR = 2.83;95%CI,1.65-4.84;P <.001)相比,双相 I 患者一级亲属也更有可能患有双相 I 障碍。
我们的结果证明了 DSM-IV 双相 I 障碍患儿一级亲属中双相 I 障碍的家族风险增加。