Suppr超能文献

交换还是放弃?多项物体追踪过程中的困难的电生理测量。

Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):213-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

Abstract

In the multiple object tracking task, participants are asked to keep targets separate from identical distractors as all items move randomly. It is well known that simple manipulations such as object speed and number of distractors dramatically alter the number of targets that are successfully tracked, but very little is known about what causes this variation in performance. One possibility is that participants tend to lose track of objects (dropping) more frequently under these conditions. Another is that the tendency to confuse a target with a distractor increases (swapping). These two mechanisms have very different implications for the attentional architecture underlying tracking. However, behavioral data alone cannot differentiate between these possibilities. In the current study, we used an electrophysiological marker of the number of items being actively tracked to assess which type of errors tended to occur during speed and distractor load manipulations. Our neural measures suggest that increased distractor load led to an increased likelihood of confusing targets with distractors while increased speed led to an increased chance of a target item being dropped. Behavioral experiments designed to test this novel prediction support this assertion.

摘要

在多目标跟踪任务中,要求参与者将目标与相同的干扰项区分开来,因为所有项目都是随机移动的。众所周知,简单的操作,如物体速度和干扰项的数量,会极大地改变成功跟踪的目标数量,但对于导致这种性能变化的原因却知之甚少。一种可能性是,在这些条件下,参与者往往更容易失去对物体的跟踪(丢弃)。另一种可能是,将目标与干扰项混淆的倾向增加(交换)。这两种机制对跟踪的注意力结构有非常不同的影响。然而,仅行为数据无法区分这些可能性。在当前的研究中,我们使用了一种主动跟踪项目数量的电生理标记来评估在速度和干扰项负载操作期间哪种类型的错误更有可能发生。我们的神经测量结果表明,增加干扰项的负载会导致目标与干扰项混淆的可能性增加,而增加速度会导致目标项目被丢弃的可能性增加。旨在检验这一新颖预测的行为实验支持了这一断言。

相似文献

1
Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking.
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):213-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
2
EEG correlates of attentional load during multiple object tracking.
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022660. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
4
Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):411-7. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.411.
6
Normal aging delays and compromises early multifocal visual attention during object tracking.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Feb;25(2):188-202. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00303. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
7
Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jun;21(6):1081-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21083.
8
Attentional Enhancement of Tracked Stimuli in Early Visual Cortex Has Limited Capacity.
J Neurosci. 2022 Nov 16;42(46):8709-8715. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0605-22.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
9
Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects.
J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 16;28(16):4183-91. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0556-08.2008.
10
Multiple object tracking and attentional processing.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2000 Mar;54(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/h0087326.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual attention and response time to distinguish athletes from non-athletes: A virtual reality study.
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0324159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324159. eCollection 2025.
2
Electrophysiology Reveals That Intuitive Physics Guides Visual Tracking and Working Memory.
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Nov 22;8:1425-1446. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00174. eCollection 2024.
3
A meta-analysis of performance advantages on athletes in multiple object tracking tasks.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 29;14(1):20086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70793-w.
5
Gaze coherence reveals distinct tracking strategies in multiple object and multiple identity tracking.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):1280-1289. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02417-9. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
6
The Impact of Audio-Visual, Visual and Auditory Cues on Multiple Object Tracking Performance in Children with Autism.
Percept Mot Skills. 2023 Oct;130(5):2047-2068. doi: 10.1177/00315125231187984. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
7
Characterizing Attention Resource Capacity in Autism: A Multiple Object Tracking Study.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Aug;54(8):2802-2815. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-05974-z. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
8
A matter of availability: sharper tuning for memorized than for perceived stimulus features.
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 8;33(12):7608-7618. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad064.
9
Multiple Players Tracking in Virtual Reality: Influence of Soccer Specific Trajectories and Relationship With Gaze Activity.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 20;13:901438. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901438. eCollection 2022.
10
Exploring the effectiveness of auditory, visual, and audio-visual sensory cues in a multiple object tracking environment.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1611-1624. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02492-5. Epub 2022 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Close encounters of the distracting kind: identifying the cause of visual tracking errors.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 May;74(4):703-15. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0260-1.
2
Exhausting attentional tracking resources with a single fast-moving object.
Cognition. 2012 May;123(2):218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
3
Neural measures of dynamic changes in attentive tracking load.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb;24(2):440-50. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00107. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
4
The what-where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jul;73(5):1422-34. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0089-7.
5
Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive tracking.
J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 12;31(2):659-68. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1339-10.2011.
6
The role of "rescue saccades" in tracking objects through occlusions.
J Vis. 2010 Dec 29;10(14):29. doi: 10.1167/10.14.29.
7
Direction information in multiple object tracking is limited by a graded resource.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Oct;72(7):1765-75. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1765.
8
Self-motion impairs multiple-object tracking.
Cognition. 2010 Oct;117(1):80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Jul 24.
9
Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not by speed, time, or capacity.
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):920-5. doi: 10.1177/0956797610373935. Epub 2010 Jun 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验