Suppr超能文献

线索回忆中的选择性提取:提取线索与编码领域的作用。

Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.

作者信息

McEvoy C L, Nelson D L

机构信息

University of South Florida, Tampa.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1990 Jan;18(1):15-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03202641.

Abstract

The purpose of these experiments was to determine whether retrieval access in cued recall can be selectively restricted to a single domain of encoding when information has been encoded within two domains as different as word sound and word meaning. In Experiment 1, the subjects studied pairs of rhyming words differing in rhyme set size under verbal-repetition or interactive-imagery instructions. Recall was cued with study-context rhymes, with extralist rhymes, or with extralist associates. The results indicated that rhyme set size and instructional effects were found no matter how recall was cued, indicating that both domains of encoding were always accessed. In Experiment 2, potential effects of study time and overt naming of the test cues were explored. These results indicated that both domains of encoding were accessed, except when long study times were available and subjects did not have to name the rhyme test cues. Rhyme set-size effects were eliminated under these conditions, suggesting that selective access to encoded meaning is possible in cued recall. Retrieval access in this task appears to be more controlled by domains of encoding than by information directly available in the cue, and access to encoded information can be restricted to a single domain.

摘要

这些实验的目的是确定,当信息在两个差异极大的编码领域(如单词发音和单词含义)中进行编码时,线索回忆中的提取访问是否可以选择性地限制在单个编码领域。在实验1中,受试者在言语重复或交互式意象指令下学习不同韵脚集大小的押韵单词对。回忆的线索是学习情境中的韵脚、列表外韵脚或列表外联想词。结果表明,无论回忆线索如何,都能发现韵脚集大小和指令效应,这表明两个编码领域总是会被访问。在实验2中,研究了学习时间和测试线索的公开命名的潜在影响。这些结果表明,除了有较长的学习时间且受试者无需说出押韵测试线索时,两个编码领域都会被访问。在这些条件下,韵脚集大小效应被消除,这表明在线索回忆中可能会选择性地访问编码含义。在这个任务中,提取访问似乎更多地受编码领域控制,而非线索中直接可用的信息,并且对编码信息的访问可以限制在单个领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验