Suppr超能文献

为住院老年患者提供在其偏好地点离世的选择。

Offering older hospitalised patients the choice to die in their preferred place.

机构信息

Department of Elderly Medicine, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 2013 Jan;89(1047):20-4. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131161. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of older people state a preference to die at home. However, the vast majority of people in hospital recognised as dying subsequently die there.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the proportion of older people dying in hospital where the possibility of ending life elsewhere was explored. To identify factors that could support hospital staff to enable patients' wishes to be met.

METHODS

Retrospective case-note review of 100 older patients (>75 years) who died during 2009 in an English Hospital.

RESULTS

Age range 75-97 years. Time from admission to death ranged from 0-118 days (median 8.5). 16% died within the first 48 h, rising to 30% for those from care homes. In only 8 patients was a potential alternative place of death discussed. Although subjective, in 10 patients it was considered admission could have been avoided through Advance Care Planning (ACP) to allow patients with poor prognosis to die in their normal place of residence or a hospice. 55% of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation orders were made within 48 h of admission. 38% were commenced on the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), 1-504 h before death (median 16).

CONCLUSIONS

In few cases are the preferred places of death discussed in older people who die in our hospital. Although hospital admission was largely appropriate, in a minority judicious ACP could have avoided death in hospital. We recommend (1) increased use of ACP, with appropriate practicalities planned in advance (2) wide-scale introduction of the 'Rapid Discharge Home of the Dying Patient pathway' (3) routinely discussing preferred place of death in appropriate key situations (eg, discussion of resuscitation status or commencing the LCP).

摘要

背景

相当一部分老年人表示希望在家中离世。然而,绝大多数被认为即将离世的住院患者最终还是在医院去世。

目的

确定在哪些情况下探讨了在其他地方结束生命的可能性,以及确定可以支持医院工作人员实现患者愿望的因素。

方法

回顾性分析了 2009 年在一家英国医院去世的 100 名(>75 岁)老年患者的病历记录。

结果

年龄范围在 75-97 岁之间。从入院到死亡的时间从 0 到 118 天不等(中位数为 8.5 天)。16%的患者在入院后 48 小时内死亡,而来自养老院的患者这一比例上升至 30%。仅有 8 名患者讨论了潜在的替代死亡地点。尽管是主观的,但在 10 名患者中,通过预先医疗指令(ACP)认为可以避免入院,以便预后较差的患者在其正常居住场所或临终关怀机构中去世。55%的不复苏医嘱是在入院后 48 小时内下达的。38%的患者开始使用利物浦护理路径(LCP),从入院到死亡的中位数为 16 小时。

结论

在我们医院去世的老年患者中,很少有讨论其偏好的死亡地点。尽管住院治疗在很大程度上是合适的,但在少数情况下,明智的 ACP 可以避免患者在医院死亡。我们建议:(1)增加 ACP 的使用,并提前规划适当的实际操作;(2)广泛引入“临终患者快速出院途径”;(3)在适当的关键情况下(例如,讨论复苏状态或开始使用 LCP),常规讨论首选的死亡地点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验