• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对多物体图片中空间构图的审美偏好。

Aesthetic preference for spatial composition in multiobject pictures.

作者信息

Leyssen Mieke H R, Linsen Sarah, Sammartino Jonathan, Palmer Stephen E

机构信息

University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, Tiensestraat 102, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium; e-mail:

出版信息

Iperception. 2012;3(1):25-49. doi: 10.1068/i0458aap. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1068/i0458aap
PMID:23145265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3485813/
Abstract

Five experiments examined preferences for horizontal positions in multiobject pictures. In Experiment 1, each picture contained a fixed object and an object whose position could be adjusted to create the most (or least) aesthetically pleasing image. Observers placed the movable object closer to the fixed object when the objects were related than when they were unrelated (a relatedness bias) but almost never overlapped them (a separation bias). Experiment 2 showed that these results were not due to demand characteristics by replicating them almost exactly in a between-participants design. In Experiment 3, preference rankings revealed a strong relatedness bias together with an inward bias toward the spatial envelope of objects to point into the frame. A weak balance effect was evident in a multiple regression analysis. Experiment 4 replicated the inward bias for the spatial envelope using multiobject groups. Experiment 5 generalized the above findings for different objects when observers had to choose between image pairs that differed only in interobject distance or degree of balance. Strong relatedness effects were again present, but there was no evidence of any preference for balance.

摘要

五项实验研究了多物体图片中对水平位置的偏好。在实验1中,每张图片包含一个固定物体和一个位置可调整的物体,以创造出最(或最不)美观的图像。当物体相关时,观察者会将可移动物体放置得比不相关时更靠近固定物体(相关性偏差),但几乎从不使它们重叠(分离偏差)。实验2通过在被试间设计中几乎完全重复这些结果,表明这些结果并非由需求特征导致。在实验3中,偏好排名显示出强烈的相关性偏差以及朝向物体空间包络向内指向画面框架的偏差。多元回归分析中明显存在微弱的平衡效应。实验4使用多物体组重复了对空间包络的向内偏差。实验5将上述发现推广到不同物体上,当观察者必须在仅物体间距离或平衡程度不同的图像对之间进行选择时。再次出现了强烈的相关性效应,但没有证据表明对平衡有任何偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/aabdf37cd915/i-perception-3-25-g0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/18670ad763b1/i-perception-3-25-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/834a820e399f/i-perception-3-25-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/dcd53b9a50a7/i-perception-3-25-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/16100923c6e6/i-perception-3-25-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/010479c0bd4e/i-perception-3-25-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/5ae760f05db8/i-perception-3-25-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/07dd954f342b/i-perception-3-25-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/d660fdaea78a/i-perception-3-25-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/138908cbf89c/i-perception-3-25-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/6fd590c83122/i-perception-3-25-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/3d48b3da07a4/i-perception-3-25-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/42900352b739/i-perception-3-25-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/4cedf3f0ceb4/i-perception-3-25-g0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/aabdf37cd915/i-perception-3-25-g0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/18670ad763b1/i-perception-3-25-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/834a820e399f/i-perception-3-25-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/dcd53b9a50a7/i-perception-3-25-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/16100923c6e6/i-perception-3-25-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/010479c0bd4e/i-perception-3-25-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/5ae760f05db8/i-perception-3-25-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/07dd954f342b/i-perception-3-25-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/d660fdaea78a/i-perception-3-25-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/138908cbf89c/i-perception-3-25-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/6fd590c83122/i-perception-3-25-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/3d48b3da07a4/i-perception-3-25-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/42900352b739/i-perception-3-25-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/4cedf3f0ceb4/i-perception-3-25-g0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b3/3485813/aabdf37cd915/i-perception-3-25-g0014.jpg

相似文献

1
Aesthetic preference for spatial composition in multiobject pictures.对多物体图片中空间构图的审美偏好。
Iperception. 2012;3(1):25-49. doi: 10.1068/i0458aap. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
2
Effects of Implied Motion and Facing Direction on Positional Preferences in Single-Object Pictures.暗示运动和朝向对单物体图片中位置偏好的影响。
Perception. 2017 Jul;46(7):815-829. doi: 10.1177/0301006617694189. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
3
Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects.空间构图中的美学问题:位置和方向对单个物体取景的影响。
Spat Vis. 2008;21(3-5):421-49. doi: 10.1163/156856808784532662.
4
Seeing and liking: biased perception of ambiguous figures consistent with the "inward bias" in aesthetic preferences.看见与喜好:对模糊图形的偏向性感知与审美偏好中的“内向偏见”一致。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1444-51. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0617-2.
5
Aesthetic preferences in the size of images of real-world objects.对现实世界物体图像大小的审美偏好。
Perception. 2011;40(3):291-8. doi: 10.1068/p6835.
6
Linking "what" and "where" information: How the strength of object categories influences children's memory for object locations.关联“什么”与“哪里”的信息:物体类别的强度如何影响儿童对物体位置的记忆。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 May;157:95-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of vertical position and perspective on framing single objects.空间构图中的美学问题:垂直位置和透视对单个物体构图的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):865-79. doi: 10.1037/a0027736. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
8
An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects.一项使用真实物体图片进行语义启动的电生理研究。
Psychophysiology. 1999 Jan;36(1):53-65. doi: 10.1017/s0048577299971196.
9
Dynamic stimuli: accentuating aesthetic preference biases.动态刺激:强调审美偏好偏见。
Laterality. 2014;19(5):549-59. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2014.886585. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
10
Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect.左侧视觉忽视中的多种知觉扭曲及其调节
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(7):1073-86. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00140-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic transition from boundary extension to contraction along an object-to-scene continuum.系统地从边界延伸过渡到收缩,沿着物体到场景连续体。
J Vis. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.1.9.
2
Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.我们是否享受我们所感知到的事物?审美欣赏与对环境对象或事件的基本感知之间存在脱节。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct;22(5):904-951. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01004-0. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Kandinsky or Me? How Free Is the Eye of the Beholder in Abstract Art?

本文引用的文献

1
Arnheim's Gestalt theory of visual balance: Examining the compositional structure of art photographs and abstract images.阿恩海姆的视觉平衡格式塔理论:审视艺术照片和抽象图像的构图结构。
Iperception. 2011;2(6):615-47. doi: 10.1068/i0445aap. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
2
Measuring pictorial balance perception at first glance using Japanese calligraphy.使用日本书法在第一眼时测量图像平衡感知。
Iperception. 2011;2(6):508-27. doi: 10.1068/i0472aap. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
3
Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of vertical position and perspective on framing single objects.
康定斯基还是我?抽象艺术中观赏者的眼睛有多自由?
Iperception. 2019 Sep 4;10(5):2041669519867973. doi: 10.1177/2041669519867973. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.
4
But Is It really Art? The Classification of Images as "Art"/"Not Art" and Correlation with Appraisal and Viewer Interpersonal Differences.但这真的是艺术吗?图像作为“艺术”/“非艺术”的分类以及与评价和观者人际差异的相关性。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 9;8:1729. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01729. eCollection 2017.
5
Seeing and liking: biased perception of ambiguous figures consistent with the "inward bias" in aesthetic preferences.看见与喜好:对模糊图形的偏向性感知与审美偏好中的“内向偏见”一致。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1444-51. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0617-2.
6
Judging whether it is aesthetic: Does equilibrium compensate for the lack of symmetry?判断其是否具有美感:平衡能否弥补不对称的不足?
Iperception. 2013 Jan 8;4(1):57-77. doi: 10.1068/i0557. Print 2013.
7
Empirical aesthetics, the beautiful challenge: An introduction to the special issue on Art & Perception.实证美学,美丽的挑战:艺术与感知特刊引言
Iperception. 2012;3(7):455-8. doi: 10.1068/i0541aap. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
空间构图中的美学问题:垂直位置和透视对单个物体构图的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):865-79. doi: 10.1037/a0027736. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
4
The anterior bias in visual art: the case of images of animals.视觉艺术中的前偏置:以动物图像为例。
Laterality. 2011 Nov;16(6):673-89. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2010.508219. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
5
Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects.空间构图中的美学问题:位置和方向对单个物体取景的影响。
Spat Vis. 2008;21(3-5):421-49. doi: 10.1163/156856808784532662.
6
Spatial balance of color triads in the abstract art of Piet Mondrian.皮特·蒙德里安抽象艺术中色彩三元组的空间平衡。
Perception. 2005;34(2):169-89. doi: 10.1068/p5033.
7
An empirical investigation of the visual rightness theory of picture perception.图片感知视觉正确性理论的实证研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 Oct;114(2):147-64. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.07.001.
8
Factors contributing to the implicit dynamic quality of static abstract designs.促成静态抽象设计的隐性动态特质的因素。
Perception. 2002;31(9):1093-107. doi: 10.1068/p3299.
9
An empirical evaluation of the visual rightness theory of pictorial composition.对绘画构图视觉正确性理论的实证评估。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1999 Dec;103(3):261-80. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00044-x.
10
The apparent heaviness of colours.颜色的明显重量感。
Nature. 1974 Jul 12;250(462):164-5. doi: 10.1038/250164a0.