Mitra Tavakoli, PhD Omar Asghar, MRCP Uazman Alam, MRCP Ioannis N. Petropoulos, MSc Hassan Fadavi, MD Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9NT, UK.
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Apr;1(2):69-88. doi: 10.1177/2042018810370954.
Diabetic neuropathy is common, under or misdiagnosed, and causes substantial morbidity with increased mortality. Defining and developing sensitive diagnostic tests for diabetic neuropathy is not only key to implementing earlier interventions but also to ensure that the most appropriate endpoints are employed in clinical intervention trials. This is critical as many potentially effective therapies may never progress to the clinic, not due to a lack of therapeutic effect, but because the endpoints were not sufficiently sensitive or robust to identify benefit. Apart from improving glycaemic control, there is no licensed treatment for diabetic neuropathy, however, a number of pathogenetic pathways remain under active study. Painful diabetic neuropathy is a cause of considerable morbidity and whilst many pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions are currently used, only two are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. We address the important issue of the 'placebo effect' and also consider potential new pharmacological therapies as well as nonpharmacological interventions in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.
糖尿病性神经病很常见,但却存在诊断不足或误诊的情况,它会导致发病率增加,死亡率上升。为糖尿病性神经病定义并开发出更敏感的诊断测试不仅是实施早期干预的关键,还能确保在临床干预试验中使用最合适的终点。这一点至关重要,因为许多有潜在疗效的疗法可能永远无法进入临床,这并不是因为缺乏治疗效果,而是因为终点不够敏感或稳健,无法确定疗效。除了改善血糖控制外,目前还没有针对糖尿病性神经病的许可治疗方法,但是,许多发病机制途径仍在积极研究中。痛性糖尿病神经病是造成相当大发病率的一个原因,虽然目前有许多药物和非药物干预措施,但只有两种被美国食品和药物管理局批准。我们将探讨“安慰剂效应”这一重要问题,并考虑在治疗痛性糖尿病神经病方面的潜在新的药理学治疗方法以及非药物干预措施。